- From: Michiel Bijl (list) <michiel.list@moiety.me>
- Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2017 18:03:11 +0000
- To: W3C WAI Accessible Platform Architectures <public-apa@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <17A1AE96-7A5E-4655-8901-6714423DA587@moiety.me>
The minutes for today’s call can be found as text in this e-mail or at the following URL: https://www.w3.org/2017/01/25-apa-minutes.html
For what it’s worth, was only 2.500 words.
— Michiel
[1]W3C
[1] http://www.w3.org/
- DRAFT -
Accessible Platform Architectures Working Group Teleconference
25 Jan 2017
See also: [2]IRC log
[2] http://www.w3.org/2017/01/25-apa-irc
Attendees
Present
MichielBijl, Ralph, Léonie, Janina, Gottfried,
Joanmarie_Diggs, MichaelC, ShaneM, Judy, JF, tdrake
Regrets
Chair
Janina
Scribe
MichielBijl
Contents
* [3]Topics
1. [4]preview agenda with items from two minutes
2. [5]Media Accessibility in W3C Specs
3. [6]Input Events
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-apa/2016Nov
/0005.html
4. [7]Updating DOM--Any RFEs?
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-dom/2017JanMa
r/0000.html
5. [8]APA's Accessibility Checklist
6. [9]next and future meetings
* [10]Summary of Action Items
* [11]Summary of Resolutions
__________________________________________________________
<janina_> /me michaelc: EMERGENCY: Can't get in on Webex for
APA with 647 857 439
<janina_> Argh. Webex is misbehaving. The 9 digit code isn't
working for me
<janina_> No go here either via SIP (my usual) or direct dial
PSTN
<janina_> Will try again
<scribe> scribe: MichielBijl
preview agenda with items from two minutes
JS: Hope to have Judy here today
are we doing enough?
are there missing pieces?
Welcome Ralph!
Any news or other relevant tidbits?
LW: We published a new update to HTML 5.2
Working draft update, no big milestone, nothing that impacts
accessibility
Media Accessibility in W3C Specs
JS: we did a lot of work to make sure HTML 5 supports
everything we can reasonably expect
We went through and came up with all kind use cases
Came up with a notes document
<janina_> [12]http://www.w3.org/TR/media-accessibility-reqs/
[12] http://www.w3.org/TR/media-accessibility-reqs/
That is the basis by which we talked to HTML about how to
support it
It should not be a surprise that some of them text
Some of them are binary
Like video or audio files
And some of this is fixed up in use cases
I know we’re listed in a charter
Has just been renewed for another year
Some of the folks there are familiar with what we’re about
In some cases I’m seeing new names
Not sure if they’re aware of what we’re about
In some cases it’s hard to find out what an API is about
There’re enormous opportunities to get this right
Users at home
Educational videos
In a school setting for example
Or even in a movie theatre
HTML should be an inter-operable device
Make it possible for hearing impaired users to use their smart
device to listen to the main track or audio described track
Maybe we have to update the MAUR
We did for visual impaired users
Not sure we did for hearing impaired users
Might have documented some issues, but not the solutions
You can find plenty of examples where you have subtitles and
audio description
RS: Thank you for inviting me
<Ralph> [Ralph notes [13]http://www.daltonize.org/ for
Daltonization]
[13] http://www.daltonize.org/
JF: I’m just curious
You made mention of delivering solutions
Was my understanding that the MAUR was about documenting use
cases
<Zakim> JF, you wanted to ask if it is the role of the MAUR to
deliver "solutions", rather than articulating needs?
JB: Motivation was to find the support between HTML and ??
We wanted to achieve a technology neutral document
With of those things in hand it should facilitate the
technology options
Until we have that each meeting there is a discussion
scribe: a debate between which technology better address some
user needs, TTML, or WebVTT?
We noticed that since then there are a couple of groups
That from time to time work in areas that relate to media
accessibility, but without realizing the tie-ins such as the
need for APIs, nor the availability of the MAUR doc
One aspect is colour schemes
Another is flash mitigation
We can just capture the colour scheme aspect and the flash
mitigation
Happy to tell more about
it
JS: And very important
Also some legal ramifications
Make sure developers are aware of them
What we need to follow through on
Most of us have non real time things in mind
There is the real time world as well that we’re working on
All of them will probably come into play
If we think of an entity like Canada
About some thing
That they would stream
Being Canadian they have to do it in English and French.
But you would also like to support the third scenario
??
Also automatically decide which language you need
Not sure WebRTC is appropriate for that
We don’t have a standardised control
JF: I’m struggling to understand what it is we’re trying to
achieve
JB: There’s still a very active a11y effort in W3C
We’re opparating in different ways
And media a11y issues come up sometimes
In unexpected placed
I think it may be useful to look at this question of where are
media a11y opportunities coming up
What would the APA need
We want to drive the support for media a11y support
JF: There have been two specific issues
??
The other is about, lost the thread, switching between
languages etc
Real time support
That somehow they can choose they can choose which audio stream
they want to select?
JS: Yeah, and also video
RS: The content has to be there
Our scope here is to say the content should be available
And we need the infrastructure support
for users to choose languages
JS: ANd that last point is what APA is running into to
We need to review whether it’s relevant
We know it’s related to audio or something else
I spend a lot of time on MEDIA
We weren’t only talking about real time, but it’s hard to tell
sometimes where it fits
Where these APIs fit in the larger picture
For APA one thing that is missing is how to place the APIs in
the larger scheme
Sometimes it’s hard to start the conversation on that.
<Zakim> Judy, you wanted to ask a question
<Judy> [14]https://www.w3.org/TR/media-accessibility-reqs/#toc
[14] https://www.w3.org/TR/media-accessibility-reqs/#toc
JB: Are you asking hey let’s look at maybe how can we make the
document better known?
If you look at the structure of the document
There’re three main sections
1. Summary of Accessible Media Requirements by Type of
Disability
2. Alternative Content Technologies
3. System Requirements
*description of these categories, please refer to document
itself*
<JF> I am still confused. The use-cases Janina has risen seems
(to me) to be covered in the MAUR already. For example, the
ability to switch language streams should be covered by this:
[DAC-3] The user can browse the alternatives and switch between
them.
<JF> and perhaps this: [DAC-7] During time-based media
playback, the user can determine which tracks are available and
select or deselect tracks. These selections may override global
default settings for captions, descriptions, etc.
JB: I’m thinking maybe coming up with structure questions to
focus people’s attention could get us farther
Does that match at all what you’re trying to achieve with this
document?
JS: It does for me
JB: John does it help you?
JF: I mean, you brought up a use case, I went and looked at the
MAUR, we have two uses cases that fit your issues
JS: I think it might be point 2 and 3
Point 2 is a frequent issue for APA
What we expect a particular API to achieve
What could conceivable be picked up by implementers and the
like
Then we start to look at do we ??
as well as APIs and so forth.
RS: John’s question makes an interesting point
As new WG are formed
It’s hard for different WGs to look at APIs and see what the
intersections may be
If we remind them that the MAUR exists
If there is one thing I would encourage the APA to do
Is to publish an update
Would encourage to stage multiple updates
To get more exposure as you update regularly
JF: Want a sanity check
What I’m hearing is we’re talking about two things
1. Perhaps need to revisit MAUR and plug things
2. How do we socialise the MAUR
(within the W3C)
Am I understanding this correctly
JS & JB: Yes
JS: Or a spin off
MAUR 2: Die Harder
JS: Michael should we build this into the checklist?
Think we have an early draft
<Ralph> [publishing an update is one of the ways to socialize
the resource]
Doesn’t include media yet
<MichaelC> [15]http://w3c.github.io/pfwg/wtag/checklist.html
[15] http://w3c.github.io/pfwg/wtag/checklist.html
MC: So, I think in the APA we’ve been expected to come up with
user requirements
<janina_> Yes to similar counterparts
Like payments(?)
<janina_> Like payments
The centralised checklist if you scroll down to the fourth big
black bar (that’s WCAG fail Michael)
JB: Are you looking for volunteers?
JS: Yeah, I think so
A lot of us here are already overcomitted
JB: Iw ould be interested to contribute to ?? and the flash
mitigation
GZ: I would volunteer
There are some standards coming up
For example how text is contained in frames
Something we should look at when we revise this document.
JS: Any other thoughts?
RS: Thanks for inviting me and would like to return from time
to time
JS: Interested to learn how to socialise the MAUR
RS: One of our big goals
Judy has support from other seniors to spread this around
JS: Going once
going twice
sold!
JS: Michael, a question: are there any new publications?
Input Events
[16]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-apa/2016Nov/0005.html
[16] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-apa/2016Nov/0005.html
JS: This is a WP set of issues
We lost Rich S.
He was the last to review
We do have some comments from back in November
LW: Did they make it as far as the group working on the spec
JS: They might need some cleanup before we formally put them
forward
Not exactly sure how to go about the cleanup
LW: Don’t mind taking a look at them
The group that are working on them have a planned call around
13th of February
I’ll prioritise this
JS: Do you want two weeks?
<janina_> ACTION: Leonie to move forward from Rich's start re
Input Events
[17]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-apa/2016Nov/0005
.html due +2 weeks [recorded in
[18]http://www.w3.org/2017/01/25-apa-minutes.html#action01]
[17] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-apa/2016Nov/0005.html
[18] http://www.w3.org/2017/01/25-apa-minutes.html#action01]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-2110 - Move forward from rich's start
re input events
[19]http://lists.w3.org/archives/public/public-apa/2016nov/0005
.html due +2 weeks [on Léonie Watson - due 2017-02-01].
[19] http://lists.w3.org/archives/public/public-apa/2016nov/0005.html
LW: Yes, won’t be here next week, will try to respond to the
list before then.
<MichaelC> action-2110 due 2 weeks
<trackbot> Set action-2110 Move forward from rich's start re
input events
[20]http://lists.w3.org/archives/public/public-apa/2016nov/0005
.html due +2 weeks due date to 2017-02-08.
[20] http://lists.w3.org/archives/public/public-apa/2016nov/0005.html
<MichaelC> action-2110:
[21]https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/wiki/Input_Events
[21] https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/wiki/Input_Events
<trackbot> Notes added to action-2110 Move forward from rich's
start re input events
[22]http://lists.w3.org/archives/public/public-apa/2016nov/0005
.html due +2 weeks.
[22] http://lists.w3.org/archives/public/public-apa/2016nov/0005.html
<MichaelC> action-2110:
[23]https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-apa/2016Nov/000
5.html
[23] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-apa/2016Nov/0005.html
<trackbot> Notes added to action-2110 Move forward from rich's
start re input events
[24]http://lists.w3.org/archives/public/public-apa/2016nov/0005
.html due +2 weeks.
[24] http://lists.w3.org/archives/public/public-apa/2016nov/0005.html
Updating DOM--Any RFEs?
[25]https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-dom/2017JanMar/0000.html
[25] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-dom/2017JanMar/0000.html
JS: There’re various DOM specs open for review
Do we need to keep bringing this up
SM: Have discussed this with Rich, please keep on the list
JS: Will do!
MC: That’s related to Shadow DOM, are there any other DOM specs
we need to track?
JS: All of them
MC: What’re all the DOM specs?
JS: Steve F. send something to the chairs list, can’t find it
at the moment
MC: I don’t see it either
Wondering if we’re missing something in our Wiki
JS: I’ll find it
Not right now, but I’ll find it or drop the question
*boom*
APA's Accessibility Checklist
MC: Don’t feel it has had sufficient review
John has accepted to reviewed it
But nobody else has made any comments
LW: Is it worth asking some people outside the a11y community
to get an outside review of it
MC: I’ve had some feedback, that it’s too wordy, needs
editorial review
Give a couple weeks for that
And as a second round do what Léonie is suggesting
Not sure where to go there
But might be best to start with groups we work with
Ask them “will this make it easier to work with us”
Maybe the furthest we can go before the AC meeting
After that we can take it to a wider audience for input
JS: John, how much time do you think you need?
JF: Want to get the spreadsheet finished first
How about a week?
JS: Okay that sounds good
s/fine/good/
JS: Calling a CFC will put us all on record
Any other business
next and future meetings
Summary of Action Items
[NEW] ACTION: Leonie to move forward from Rich's start re Input
Events
[26]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-apa/2016Nov/0005
.html due +2 weeks [recorded in
[27]http://www.w3.org/2017/01/25-apa-minutes.html#action01]
[26] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-apa/2016Nov/0005.html
[27] http://www.w3.org/2017/01/25-apa-minutes.html#action01
Summary of Resolutions
[End of minutes]
__________________________________________________________
Minutes formatted by David Booth's [28]scribe.perl version
1.148 ([29]CVS log)
$Date: 2017/01/25 18:00:26 $
__________________________________________________________
[28] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm
[29] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/
Scribe.perl diagnostic output
[Delete this section before finalizing the minutes.]
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.148 of Date: 2016/10/11 12:55:14
Check for newer version at [30]http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/
scribe/
[30] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/
Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00)
Succeeded: s/inopperable/inoperable /
Succeeded: s/inoperable/inter-operable/
Succeeded: s/??/mitigation/
Succeeded: s/WebTT/...a debate between which technology better address s
ome user needs, TTML, or WebVTT?/
Succeeded: s/can do/is appropriate for/
Succeeded: s/That from time to time ?? other APIs/That from time to time
work in areas that relate to media accessibility, but without realizing
the tie-ins such as the need for APIs, nor the availability of the MAUR
doc/
Succeeded: s/need the support/need the infrastructure support/
Succeeded: s/for lang/for users to choose lang/
Succeeded: s/sofort/so fort/
Succeeded: s/poiint/point/
Succeeded: s/so fort/so forth/
Succeeded: s/centrelised/centralised/
Succeeded: s/John has/John has accepted to/
Succeeded: s/nobody has/nobody else has/
Succeeded: s/fine/good/
FAILED: s/fine/good/
Found Scribe: MichielBijl
Inferring ScribeNick: MichielBijl
Present: MichielBijl Ralph Léonie Janina Gottfried Joanmarie_Diggs Micha
elC ShaneM Judy JF tdrake
Found Date: 25 Jan 2017
Guessing minutes URL: [31]http://www.w3.org/2017/01/25-apa-minutes.html
People with action items: leonie
[31] http://www.w3.org/2017/01/25-apa-minutes.html
WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines.
You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option.
[End of [32]scribe.perl diagnostic output]
[32] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm
Received on Wednesday, 25 January 2017 18:03:44 UTC