Re: publishing updates to the gap analysis/ road map and user research module

Lisa, 
We'll have to wait until after the holidays. 
Thanks 
Josh 
InterAccess - Accessible UX
-------- Original message --------From: Michael Cooper <cooper@w3.org> Date: 18/12/2017  23:17  (GMT+00:00) To: "lisa.seeman" <lisa.seeman@zoho.com>, Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>, Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net> Cc: "W3c-Wai-Gl-Request@W3. Org" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>, public-apa <public-apa@w3.org> Subject: Re: publishing updates to the gap analysis/ road map and user  research module 

    I don't think we should attempt to get any consensus like that
      from the WGs until after the holidays at this point, and I did
      warn that the chairs might not be able to put it on the agenda
      before the holidays when we discussed this a couple weeks ago. Now
      too many people are away already and a standing publication
      consent, which is a big decision, shouldn't be snuck through in
      that situation. 

    
    Even if you convince the chairs and manage to obtain it, I do not
      support publishing before January when there can be sufficient
      review of the proposed draft. I encourage Lisa and Roy to work
      over the next couple weeks on preparing a draft that is ready for
      review, but Roy please do not publish it until after the task
      force (and I) can take a look in January. 

    
    While I suggested obtaining a standing consent to publish, I
      meant that to remove some bureaucracy, not to remove the task
      force from the process. A draft published over the holiday would
      only have editor input, not sufficient task force and WG input,
      and that is not sufficient review for publication even with a
      standing consent on the record.

    
    Michael

    
    

    On 18/12/2017 4:45 PM, lisa.seeman
      wrote:

    
    
      
      

        Hi Folks
        

        
        The COGA Gap analysis and road map has been published with
          extremely out of date information. The user research module is
          also very out of data. Can we have the working groups consent
          to publish incremental working drafts of the Gap analysis/
          road map and user research module without going though a CFC
          process each time from both working groups. That way Roy and
          me might be able to get the current draft updated over the
          holiday. 
        
          All the best

            

            Lisa Seeman

            

            LinkedIn, Twitter