W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-apa@w3.org > December 2017

Re: publishing updates to the gap analysis/ road map and user research module

From: lisa.seeman <lisa.seeman@zoho.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2017 11:13:19 +0200
To: "Michael Cooper" <cooper@w3.org>
Cc: "Andrew Kirkpatrick" <akirkpat@adobe.com>, "Janina Sajka" <janina@rednote.net>, "W3c-Wai-Gl-Request@W3. Org" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>, "public-apa" <public-apa@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1606e0a9fa0.e09b974587318.5830859275175807752@zoho.com>

        

        
            Hi MichaelWe got the task force approval for these changes April 2016, before we asked the wg's for approval. It was just that the cfc in the working groups had the wrong information.All the bestLisa SeemanLinkedIn, Twitter---- On Tue, 19 Dec 2017 01:17:23 +0200  Michael Cooper<cooper@w3.org> wrote ----           I don't think we should attempt to get any consensus like that       from the WGs until after the holidays at this point, and I did       warn that the chairs might not be able to put it on the agenda       before the holidays when we discussed this a couple weeks ago. Now       too many people are away already and a standing publication       consent, which is a big decision, shouldn't be snuck through in       that situation.           Even if you convince the chairs and manage to obtain it, I do not       support publishing before January when there can be sufficient       review of the proposed draft. I encourage Lisa and Roy to work       over the next couple weeks on preparing a draft that is ready for       review, but Roy please do not publish it until after the task       force (and I) can take a look in January.           While I suggested obtaining a standing consent to publish, I       meant that to remove some bureaucracy, not to remove the task       force from the process. A draft published over the holiday would       only have editor input, not sufficient task force and WG input,       and that is not sufficient review for publication even with a       standing consent on the record.          Michael               On 18/12/2017 4:45 PM, lisa.seeman       wrote:                                 Hi Folks                           The COGA Gap analysis and road map has been published with           extremely out of date information. The user research module is           also very out of data. Can we have the working groups consent           to publish incremental working drafts of the Gap analysis/           road map and user research module without going though a CFC           process each time from both working groups. That way Roy and           me might be able to get the current draft updated over the           holiday.                     All the best                          Lisa Seeman                          LinkedIn, Twitter                                                                           
        
        

    
    
Received on Tuesday, 19 December 2017 09:13:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:55:28 UTC