Re: Minutes from the APA call on 11 May

Hi, Leonie:

Thanks for the specific responses in your email.

Will you be available on your regulara Wednesday APA call to walk
through these items with the WG?

Janina

Léonie Watson writes:
> Thanks for looking at the HTML5.1 review on the APA call this week Janina. A
> few quick answers to your questions...
> 
> "js: Leonie is asking for an APA review... how do we want to handle it?"
> 
> I suggest using the changes section of the spec as the starting point [1].
> It notes the (relatively small) substantive changes that need review.
> 
> " rs: would be good to know which features are at risk"
> 
> The features currently at risk can be found in Github using the deprecated
> label [2].
> 
> "sm: I don't think we got our alt text changes in..."
> 
> We have a small number of alt techniques bugs migrated from Bugzilla and now
> labelled as editorial [3]. The window for substantive changes is open until
> 31st May, but we do have the ability to make editorial changes into our CR
> period.
> 
> Léonie.
>  [1] https://www.w3.org/TR/html51/changes.html#changes 
> [2]
> https://github.com/w3c/html/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+label%3A%22Depreca
> te%3F+Stop+recommending+a+feature%3F%22 
> [3]
> https://github.com/w3c/html/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+label%3AEditorial 
> 
> -- 
> @LeonieWatson tink.uk Carpe diem
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Janina Sajka [mailto:janina@rednote.net]
> > Sent: 11 May 2016 10:02
> > To: W3C WAI Accessible Platform Architectures <public-apa@w3.org>
> > Subject: Minutes from the APA call on 11 May
> > 
> > 
> > Minutes from the APA teleconference of 11 May are provided below as text,
> > and are available as hypertext at:
> > 
> > http://www.w3.org/2016/05/11-apa-minutes.html
> > 
> > 
> >    W3C
> > 
> >
> - DRAFT -
> > 
> >                                                         Accessible
> Platform Architectures Working Group
> > Teleconference
> > 
> > 11 May 2016
> > 
> >    See also: IRC log
> > 
> > Attendees
> > 
> >    Present
> >           Janina, ShaneM, fesch, Joanmarie_Diggs, Rich_Schwerdtfeger, JF
> > 
> >    Regrets
> >           MichielBijl
> > 
> >    Chair
> >           Janina
> > 
> >    Scribe
> >           fesch
> > 
> > Contents
> > 
> >      * Topics
> >          1. preview agenda with items from two minutes
> >          2. Another Web Payments Mixup; Reschedule Next week? -- Janina
> >          3. preview agenda with items from two minutes
> >          4. Another Web Payments Mixup; Reschedule Next week? -- Janina
> >          5. TPAC 2016 Planning
> >          6. Actions Checkin (Specs)
> > https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/track/products/8
> >          7. new on TR http://www.w3.org/TR/tr-status-drafts.html
> >          8. action-2036
> >          9. CSS -- Updates and Next Steps
> >         10. open spec issues
> >      * Summary of Action Items
> >      * Summary of Resolutions
> > 
> > __________________________________________________________
> > __________________________________________________________
> > _____________________________________________
> > 
> > preview agenda with items from two minutes
> > 
> >    <scribe> scribe: fesch
> > 
> > Another Web Payments Mixup; Reschedule Next week? -- Janina
> > 
> > preview agenda with items from two minutes
> > 
> >    js: any additions, news?
> > 
> >    rs: ADA release of ARPRM
> >    ... will be focusing on state's compliance
> >    ... individual companies not included
> >    ... 90 day review period - who knows if they get comments
> >    ... puts more emphasis state government
> >    ... AccessU conference in Austin, attendance grew by 50%
> > 
> > Another Web Payments Mixup; Reschedule Next week? -- Janina
> > 
> >    js: I was only one on the call... I forgot to do my action
> > 
> >    sm: my calendar was on the old schedule...
> > 
> >    js: will put out a reminder on Monday
> > 
> > TPAC 2016 Planning
> > 
> >    js: coming along, registration opened
> >    ... not to early to look for hotels...
> > 
> >    rs: when is the TPAC?
> > 
> >    js: September 19
> >    ... have two rooms
> > 
> > Actions Checkin (Specs) https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/track/products/8
> > 
> >    action-2037
> > 
> >    <trackbot> action-2037 -- Joanmarie Diggs to Re-review
> > https://www.w3.org/tr/selection-api/ selection api -- due 2016-05-11 --
> > OPEN
> > 
> >    <trackbot> http://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/track/actions/2037
> > 
> >    action-2036
> > 
> >    <trackbot> action-2036 -- Janina Sajka to Review
> > https://www.w3.org/tr/dpub-accessibility/ digital publishing and
> accessibility
> > in w3c documents -- due 2016-05-11 --
> >    OPEN
> > 
> >    <trackbot> http://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/track/actions/2036
> > 
> >    action-2035
> > 
> >    <trackbot> action-2035 -- Shane McCarron to Review
> > https://www.w3.org/tr/annotation-model/ web annotation data model,
> > https://www.w3.org/tr/annotation-protocol/ web
> >    annotation protocol, https://www.w3.org/tr/annotation-vocab/ web
> > annotation vocabulary -- due 2016-05-11 -- OPEN
> > 
> >    <trackbot> http://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/track/actions/2035
> > 
> >    action-2034
> > 
> >    <trackbot> action-2034 -- Janina Sajka to Review
> > https://www.w3.org/tr/css-snappoints-1/ css scroll snap points module
> level
> > 1 -- due 2016-05-11 -- OPEN
> > 
> >    <trackbot> http://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/track/actions/2034
> > 
> >    action-2033
> > 
> >    <trackbot> action-2033 -- Shane McCarron to Review
> > https://www.w3.org/tr/tracking-compliance/ tracking compliance and scope
> > -- due 2016-05-11 -- OPEN
> > 
> >    <trackbot> http://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/track/actions/2033
> > 
> >    action-2030
> > 
> >    <trackbot> action-2030 -- John Foliot to See if reporting api 1
> > https://www.w3.org/tr/reporting-1/ has applicability to a11y policy
> reporting
> > -- due 2016-05-11 --
> >    OPEN
> > 
> >    <trackbot> http://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/track/actions/2030
> > 
> >    jf: response I got, may be usable for a11y policy, keep track of it
> > 
> >    action-2028
> > 
> >    <trackbot> action-2028 -- Richard Schwerdtfeger to Review secure
> contexts
> > with gpii in mind * 2016-04-20:
> > [http://www.w3.org/wai/apa/track/actions/2026 action-2026]
> >    apa asking lisa to review for coga relationship. -- due 2016-04-27 --
> OPEN
> > 
> >    <trackbot> http://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/track/actions/2028
> > 
> >    jf: I was supposed to talk to Greg V...
> > 
> >    rs: I don't have any bandwidth right now
> > 
> >    action-2011
> > 
> >    <trackbot> action-2011 -- Janina Sajka to Janina to draft examples of
> how
> > the hand-wavey stuff in CSS Transitions accessibility statement could be
> > solidified -- due
> >    2016-04-13 -- OPEN
> > 
> >    <trackbot> http://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/track/actions/2011
> > 
> >    js: hoping Michel would be here, I sent him stuff
> > 
> > new on TR http://www.w3.org/TR/tr-status-drafts.html
> > 
> >    mc: a lot of specs related to encrypted data
> >    ... do we care?
> > 
> >    sm: no
> > 
> >    <MichaelC> CSS Intrinsic & Extrinsic Sizing Module Level 3
> > 
> >    fe: I can look at it
> > 
> >    <MichaelC> ACTION: esch to review https://www.w3.org/TR/css-sizing-3/
> > CSS Intrinsic & Extrinsic Sizing Module Level 3 [recorded in
> >    http://www.w3.org/2016/05/11-apa-minutes.html#action01]
> > 
> >    <trackbot> Created ACTION-2039 - Review https://www.w3.org/tr/css-
> > sizing-3/ css intrinsic & extrinsic sizing module level 3 [on Fred Esch -
> due
> > 2016-05-18].
> > 
> >    <MichaelC> action-2039?
> > 
> >    <trackbot> action-2039 -- Fred Esch to Review
> https://www.w3.org/tr/css-
> > sizing-3/ css intrinsic & extrinsic sizing module level 3 -- due
> 2016-05-18 --
> > OPEN
> > 
> >    <trackbot> http://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/track/actions/2039
> > 
> >    mc: probably don't care it is in CR
> > 
> >    js: yes we don't care
> > 
> >    <MichaelC> TTML Media Type Definition and Profile Registry
> > 
> >    mc: reads abstract
> > 
> >    js: we probably don't...
> > 
> > action-2036
> > 
> >    action-2036
> > 
> >    <trackbot> action-2036 -- Janina Sajka to Review
> > https://www.w3.org/tr/dpub-accessibility/ digital publishing and
> accessibility
> > in w3c documents -- due 2016-05-11 --
> >    OPEN
> > 
> >    <trackbot> http://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/track/actions/2036
> > 
> >    js: very interesting... has a gap analysis between dpub and how they
> can
> > meet requirements with W3C specs
> >    ... interesting easy read
> >    ... gap closing with ODF... oasis...
> >    ... little pieces like that... don't need to do anything else - just be
> aware
> > 
> > CSS -- Updates and Next Steps
> > 
> >    js: Leonie says HTML 5.1 is almost ready....
> > 
> >    Leonie is asking for an APA review... how do we want to handle it?
> > 
> >    js: will get back to Leonie
> > 
> >    rs: would be good to know which features are at risk
> > 
> >    js: can get the most attention if she walks us through it
> > 
> >    sm: I don't think we got our alt text changes in...
> >    ... may have missed our window
> >    ... there were debates - quality of examples, discussion on longdesc
> > 
> >    js: I wouldn't want to drop it
> > 
> >    mc: we have an open review on EME and ...
> >    ... we do need to review this version
> > 
> >    js: what was published today?
> > 
> >    mc: April 29
> > 
> >    js: we sent the mail in early April - time to ask if they forgot
> > 
> >    mc: John sent them comments
> > 
> >    js: EME questions we had, you sent in early April, can you ping them?
> > 
> >    jf: Paul Cotton told us to file a bug in github...
> >    ... would need help getting it into github
> > 
> >    mc: all you need is the URL...
> > 
> >    jf: i may need to ping someone
> > 
> >    sm: you can ping me - cyns: you can ping me
> > 
> >    mc: need github training
> >    ... some folks need help
> > 
> >    <JF> EME email response from Paul Cotton:
> > https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-media/2016Apr/0001.html
> > 
> >    discussion on email - folders vs no folders... really
> > 
> >    mc: might want to scroll through the active spec reviews... might want
> to
> > walk through them
> > 
> >    js: do we need a response to Chaals?
> > 
> > open spec issues
> > 
> >    <MichaelC>
> > https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/wiki/Category:Spec_Review_Active
> > 
> >    mc: css flexbox...
> > 
> >    js: I have an action to talk with their chair
> > 
> >    cyns: based on discussion at CSUN?
> > 
> >    js: yes
> > 
> >    mc: hand wavey one...
> > 
> >    js: going to ask Leonie to walk through changes, features at risk,
> unfinished
> > alt text
> > 
> >    <ShaneM> https://w3c.github.io/alt-techniques/
> > 
> >    mc: media queries level 4 - we have a huge interest on this spec
> > 
> >    js: we thought at the time media queries were going to be more used
> with
> > CSS
> > 
> >    mc: was a question of high contrast mode ... we can mark as deferred
> and
> > come back in 6 months
> >    ... media source extension - sent comments in January
> > 
> >    <MichaelC> Media Source Extensions
> > 
> >    <MichaelC> comments sent in Jan
> > https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-apa/2016Jan/0019.html
> > 
> >    js: I will follow up
> > 
> >    mc: push API, Leonie had a review in February
> > 
> >    js: I think we said it was fine, but still pending... we should ask
> Leonie
> > 
> >    mc: webapps XX - sent reply in January, don't have any response
> > 
> >    <MichaelC> https://github.com/w3c/manifest/issues/419
> > 
> >    mc: about webapp manifest
> >    ... January 27 you made some comments
> > 
> >    <MichaelC> https://github.com/w3c/manifest/issues/419
> > 
> >    cyns: different person....
> > 
> >    <Rich> HTM5 at risk issues:
> > https://github.com/w3c/html/labels/Deprecate%3F%20Stop%20recommend
> > ing%20a%20feature%3F
> > 
> >    mc: some way we need to get back to them
> > 
> >    <MichaelC> https://www.w3.org/2016/01/27-apa-minutes.html#item04
> > 
> >    js: let me take an action to review and get back with next steps
> > 
> >    mc: some was respec changes... and color contrast issues - I don't
> > remember
> > 
> >    sm: respec doesn't control color, uses color from W3C style sheet
> > 
> >    mc: we should recheck any styling issues - before we get back to them
> > 
> >    jf: I looked at them and they did a pretty good job
> > 
> >    js: I will look up stuff
> > 
> >    mc: may be fixed by newer stylesheet
> >    ... figure 1 needed a caption
> > 
> >    <ShaneM> you are right - ReSpec does have some internal styles.
> > 
> > Summary of Action Items
> > 
> >    [NEW] ACTION: esch to review https://www.w3.org/TR/css-sizing-3/ CSS
> > Intrinsic & Extrinsic Sizing Module Level 3 [recorded in
> >    http://www.w3.org/2016/05/11-apa-minutes.html#action01]
> > 
> > Summary of Resolutions
> > 
> >    [End of minutes]
> > 
> > __________________________________________________________
> > __________________________________________________________
> > _____________________________________________
> > 
> > Found Scribe: fesch
> > Present: Janina ShaneM fesch Joanmarie_Diggs Rich_Schwerdtfeger JF
> > Regrets: MichielBijl
> > People with action items: esch
> > 
> > 
> > --
> > 
> > Janina Sajka,	Phone:	+1.443.300.2200
> > 			sip:janina@asterisk.rednote.net
> > 		Email:	janina@rednote.net
> > 
> > Linux Foundation Fellow
> > Executive Chair, Accessibility Workgroup:	http://a11y.org
> > 
> > The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI)
> > Chair, Accessible Platform Architectures	http://www.w3.org/wai/apa
> > 
> 
> 

-- 

Janina Sajka,	Phone:	+1.443.300.2200
			sip:janina@asterisk.rednote.net
		Email:	janina@rednote.net

Linux Foundation Fellow
Executive Chair, Accessibility Workgroup:	http://a11y.org

The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI)
Chair, Accessible Platform Architectures	http://www.w3.org/wai/apa

Received on Thursday, 12 May 2016 03:48:26 UTC