- From: Léonie Watson <tink@tink.uk>
- Date: Wed, 11 May 2016 15:20:09 -0700
- To: "'Janina Sajka'" <janina@rednote.net>, "'W3C WAI Accessible Platform Architectures'" <public-apa@w3.org>
Thanks for looking at the HTML5.1 review on the APA call this week Janina. A few quick answers to your questions... "js: Leonie is asking for an APA review... how do we want to handle it?" I suggest using the changes section of the spec as the starting point [1]. It notes the (relatively small) substantive changes that need review. " rs: would be good to know which features are at risk" The features currently at risk can be found in Github using the deprecated label [2]. "sm: I don't think we got our alt text changes in..." We have a small number of alt techniques bugs migrated from Bugzilla and now labelled as editorial [3]. The window for substantive changes is open until 31st May, but we do have the ability to make editorial changes into our CR period. Léonie. [1] https://www.w3.org/TR/html51/changes.html#changes [2] https://github.com/w3c/html/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+label%3A%22Depreca te%3F+Stop+recommending+a+feature%3F%22 [3] https://github.com/w3c/html/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+label%3AEditorial -- @LeonieWatson tink.uk Carpe diem > -----Original Message----- > From: Janina Sajka [mailto:janina@rednote.net] > Sent: 11 May 2016 10:02 > To: W3C WAI Accessible Platform Architectures <public-apa@w3.org> > Subject: Minutes from the APA call on 11 May > > > Minutes from the APA teleconference of 11 May are provided below as text, > and are available as hypertext at: > > http://www.w3.org/2016/05/11-apa-minutes.html > > > W3C > > - DRAFT - > > Accessible Platform Architectures Working Group > Teleconference > > 11 May 2016 > > See also: IRC log > > Attendees > > Present > Janina, ShaneM, fesch, Joanmarie_Diggs, Rich_Schwerdtfeger, JF > > Regrets > MichielBijl > > Chair > Janina > > Scribe > fesch > > Contents > > * Topics > 1. preview agenda with items from two minutes > 2. Another Web Payments Mixup; Reschedule Next week? -- Janina > 3. preview agenda with items from two minutes > 4. Another Web Payments Mixup; Reschedule Next week? -- Janina > 5. TPAC 2016 Planning > 6. Actions Checkin (Specs) > https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/track/products/8 > 7. new on TR http://www.w3.org/TR/tr-status-drafts.html > 8. action-2036 > 9. CSS -- Updates and Next Steps > 10. open spec issues > * Summary of Action Items > * Summary of Resolutions > > __________________________________________________________ > __________________________________________________________ > _____________________________________________ > > preview agenda with items from two minutes > > <scribe> scribe: fesch > > Another Web Payments Mixup; Reschedule Next week? -- Janina > > preview agenda with items from two minutes > > js: any additions, news? > > rs: ADA release of ARPRM > ... will be focusing on state's compliance > ... individual companies not included > ... 90 day review period - who knows if they get comments > ... puts more emphasis state government > ... AccessU conference in Austin, attendance grew by 50% > > Another Web Payments Mixup; Reschedule Next week? -- Janina > > js: I was only one on the call... I forgot to do my action > > sm: my calendar was on the old schedule... > > js: will put out a reminder on Monday > > TPAC 2016 Planning > > js: coming along, registration opened > ... not to early to look for hotels... > > rs: when is the TPAC? > > js: September 19 > ... have two rooms > > Actions Checkin (Specs) https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/track/products/8 > > action-2037 > > <trackbot> action-2037 -- Joanmarie Diggs to Re-review > https://www.w3.org/tr/selection-api/ selection api -- due 2016-05-11 -- > OPEN > > <trackbot> http://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/track/actions/2037 > > action-2036 > > <trackbot> action-2036 -- Janina Sajka to Review > https://www.w3.org/tr/dpub-accessibility/ digital publishing and accessibility > in w3c documents -- due 2016-05-11 -- > OPEN > > <trackbot> http://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/track/actions/2036 > > action-2035 > > <trackbot> action-2035 -- Shane McCarron to Review > https://www.w3.org/tr/annotation-model/ web annotation data model, > https://www.w3.org/tr/annotation-protocol/ web > annotation protocol, https://www.w3.org/tr/annotation-vocab/ web > annotation vocabulary -- due 2016-05-11 -- OPEN > > <trackbot> http://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/track/actions/2035 > > action-2034 > > <trackbot> action-2034 -- Janina Sajka to Review > https://www.w3.org/tr/css-snappoints-1/ css scroll snap points module level > 1 -- due 2016-05-11 -- OPEN > > <trackbot> http://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/track/actions/2034 > > action-2033 > > <trackbot> action-2033 -- Shane McCarron to Review > https://www.w3.org/tr/tracking-compliance/ tracking compliance and scope > -- due 2016-05-11 -- OPEN > > <trackbot> http://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/track/actions/2033 > > action-2030 > > <trackbot> action-2030 -- John Foliot to See if reporting api 1 > https://www.w3.org/tr/reporting-1/ has applicability to a11y policy reporting > -- due 2016-05-11 -- > OPEN > > <trackbot> http://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/track/actions/2030 > > jf: response I got, may be usable for a11y policy, keep track of it > > action-2028 > > <trackbot> action-2028 -- Richard Schwerdtfeger to Review secure contexts > with gpii in mind * 2016-04-20: > [http://www.w3.org/wai/apa/track/actions/2026 action-2026] > apa asking lisa to review for coga relationship. -- due 2016-04-27 -- OPEN > > <trackbot> http://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/track/actions/2028 > > jf: I was supposed to talk to Greg V... > > rs: I don't have any bandwidth right now > > action-2011 > > <trackbot> action-2011 -- Janina Sajka to Janina to draft examples of how > the hand-wavey stuff in CSS Transitions accessibility statement could be > solidified -- due > 2016-04-13 -- OPEN > > <trackbot> http://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/track/actions/2011 > > js: hoping Michel would be here, I sent him stuff > > new on TR http://www.w3.org/TR/tr-status-drafts.html > > mc: a lot of specs related to encrypted data > ... do we care? > > sm: no > > <MichaelC> CSS Intrinsic & Extrinsic Sizing Module Level 3 > > fe: I can look at it > > <MichaelC> ACTION: esch to review https://www.w3.org/TR/css-sizing-3/ > CSS Intrinsic & Extrinsic Sizing Module Level 3 [recorded in > http://www.w3.org/2016/05/11-apa-minutes.html#action01] > > <trackbot> Created ACTION-2039 - Review https://www.w3.org/tr/css- > sizing-3/ css intrinsic & extrinsic sizing module level 3 [on Fred Esch - due > 2016-05-18]. > > <MichaelC> action-2039? > > <trackbot> action-2039 -- Fred Esch to Review https://www.w3.org/tr/css- > sizing-3/ css intrinsic & extrinsic sizing module level 3 -- due 2016-05-18 -- > OPEN > > <trackbot> http://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/track/actions/2039 > > mc: probably don't care it is in CR > > js: yes we don't care > > <MichaelC> TTML Media Type Definition and Profile Registry > > mc: reads abstract > > js: we probably don't... > > action-2036 > > action-2036 > > <trackbot> action-2036 -- Janina Sajka to Review > https://www.w3.org/tr/dpub-accessibility/ digital publishing and accessibility > in w3c documents -- due 2016-05-11 -- > OPEN > > <trackbot> http://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/track/actions/2036 > > js: very interesting... has a gap analysis between dpub and how they can > meet requirements with W3C specs > ... interesting easy read > ... gap closing with ODF... oasis... > ... little pieces like that... don't need to do anything else - just be aware > > CSS -- Updates and Next Steps > > js: Leonie says HTML 5.1 is almost ready.... > > Leonie is asking for an APA review... how do we want to handle it? > > js: will get back to Leonie > > rs: would be good to know which features are at risk > > js: can get the most attention if she walks us through it > > sm: I don't think we got our alt text changes in... > ... may have missed our window > ... there were debates - quality of examples, discussion on longdesc > > js: I wouldn't want to drop it > > mc: we have an open review on EME and ... > ... we do need to review this version > > js: what was published today? > > mc: April 29 > > js: we sent the mail in early April - time to ask if they forgot > > mc: John sent them comments > > js: EME questions we had, you sent in early April, can you ping them? > > jf: Paul Cotton told us to file a bug in github... > ... would need help getting it into github > > mc: all you need is the URL... > > jf: i may need to ping someone > > sm: you can ping me - cyns: you can ping me > > mc: need github training > ... some folks need help > > <JF> EME email response from Paul Cotton: > https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-media/2016Apr/0001.html > > discussion on email - folders vs no folders... really > > mc: might want to scroll through the active spec reviews... might want to > walk through them > > js: do we need a response to Chaals? > > open spec issues > > <MichaelC> > https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/wiki/Category:Spec_Review_Active > > mc: css flexbox... > > js: I have an action to talk with their chair > > cyns: based on discussion at CSUN? > > js: yes > > mc: hand wavey one... > > js: going to ask Leonie to walk through changes, features at risk, unfinished > alt text > > <ShaneM> https://w3c.github.io/alt-techniques/ > > mc: media queries level 4 - we have a huge interest on this spec > > js: we thought at the time media queries were going to be more used with > CSS > > mc: was a question of high contrast mode ... we can mark as deferred and > come back in 6 months > ... media source extension - sent comments in January > > <MichaelC> Media Source Extensions > > <MichaelC> comments sent in Jan > https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-apa/2016Jan/0019.html > > js: I will follow up > > mc: push API, Leonie had a review in February > > js: I think we said it was fine, but still pending... we should ask Leonie > > mc: webapps XX - sent reply in January, don't have any response > > <MichaelC> https://github.com/w3c/manifest/issues/419 > > mc: about webapp manifest > ... January 27 you made some comments > > <MichaelC> https://github.com/w3c/manifest/issues/419 > > cyns: different person.... > > <Rich> HTM5 at risk issues: > https://github.com/w3c/html/labels/Deprecate%3F%20Stop%20recommend > ing%20a%20feature%3F > > mc: some way we need to get back to them > > <MichaelC> https://www.w3.org/2016/01/27-apa-minutes.html#item04 > > js: let me take an action to review and get back with next steps > > mc: some was respec changes... and color contrast issues - I don't > remember > > sm: respec doesn't control color, uses color from W3C style sheet > > mc: we should recheck any styling issues - before we get back to them > > jf: I looked at them and they did a pretty good job > > js: I will look up stuff > > mc: may be fixed by newer stylesheet > ... figure 1 needed a caption > > <ShaneM> you are right - ReSpec does have some internal styles. > > Summary of Action Items > > [NEW] ACTION: esch to review https://www.w3.org/TR/css-sizing-3/ CSS > Intrinsic & Extrinsic Sizing Module Level 3 [recorded in > http://www.w3.org/2016/05/11-apa-minutes.html#action01] > > Summary of Resolutions > > [End of minutes] > > __________________________________________________________ > __________________________________________________________ > _____________________________________________ > > Found Scribe: fesch > Present: Janina ShaneM fesch Joanmarie_Diggs Rich_Schwerdtfeger JF > Regrets: MichielBijl > People with action items: esch > > > -- > > Janina Sajka, Phone: +1.443.300.2200 > sip:janina@asterisk.rednote.net > Email: janina@rednote.net > > Linux Foundation Fellow > Executive Chair, Accessibility Workgroup: http://a11y.org > > The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) > Chair, Accessible Platform Architectures http://www.w3.org/wai/apa >
Received on Wednesday, 11 May 2016 22:23:10 UTC