Hi Fred -
I'm keeping the wiki up to date with information like this:
https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/wiki/Micropub
Janina sent comments indicating they were draft comments, but they
replied indicating they opened an issue. I think that's probably as far
as we need to go right now since they acknowledged it, unless Janina
wants to follow up with "by the way, that's the official comment now". I
subscribed to the github issue so I can track when they work in it; you
might want to as well. So far they seem to have created a spin-off issue
but not addressed ours directly yet.
Michael
On 20/07/2016 7:50 AM, Fred Esch wrote:
>
> Hi Janina,
>
> On July 6 I sent a draft response on Micropub
> <https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-apa/2016Jul/0012.html> to
> APA. You were the onlyresponse
> <https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-apa/2016Jul/0013.html>. I
> don't recall if feedback was ever forwarded to Micropub. Were you
> going to send the feedback to Micropub or was I? Do we need any
> additional discussion or a CfC (ick)?
>
> Your email on the decision policy has me a bit worried about too many
> CfCs being made. I am not in favor CfCs for responses for pubs unless
> they were controversial.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Fred Esch
> Watson, IBM, W3C Accessibility
> IBM Watson Watson Release Management and Quality
>
>
>