W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-apa@w3.org > August 2016

Re: ACTION-2053: Draft-y language for Accessibility Considerations sections

From: Léonie Watson <tink@tink.uk>
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 19:09:23 +0100
To: Shane McCarron <shane@spec-ops.io>
Cc: Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL <ryladog@gmail.com>, Accessible Platform Architectures Working Group <public-apa@w3.org>
Message-ID: <99888958-6acd-b1e5-f9d7-5f0e203e1314@tink.uk>
LGTM.


-- 
@LeonieWatson tink.uk Carpe diem

On 10/08/2016 17:41, Shane McCarron wrote:
> So, to be clear, the final version of the proposed wording is:
>
>     This specification has no defined user interface. Consequently,
>     there are no specific accessibility requirements on implementations.
>     However, to the extent that an implementation provides user
>     interactions to support this specification, the implementation must
>     ensure that the interface is exposed to the platform accessibility
>     API. Moreover, implementors should take into consideration the needs
>     of their users with varying abilities when designing solutions that
>     implement this specification. For example, the use of biometric
>     authentication techniques should be varied enough to allow for
>     people with widely differing physical abilities.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 8:21 AM, Léonie Watson <tink@tink.uk
> <mailto:tink@tink.uk>> wrote:
>
>     On 09/08/2016 14:12, Shane McCarron wrote:
>
>         Nice!  Friendly amendment?  I think that "widely differing physical
>         abilities" is more poetic than "widely different physical
>         abilities".
>         What do you think?
>
>     +1
>
>
>     Léonie.
>
>
>     --
>     @LeonieWatson tink.uk <http://tink.uk> Carpe diem
>
>
>
>
> --
> Shane McCarron
> Projects Manager, Spec-Ops
Received on Wednesday, 10 August 2016 18:10:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:55:22 UTC