- From: Judy Brewer <jbrewer@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2020 01:23:12 -0400
- To: "Janina Sajka (janina@rednote.net)" <janina@rednote.net>, Accessible Platform Architectures Administration <public-apa-admin@w3.org>
- Cc: Judy Brewer <jbrewer@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <ae633543-fa56-33c1-0218-6cfff766beee@w3.org>
Hi Janina and APA WG, Thanks for the chance to review. Several comments follow. I'm unclear what the timeline is, since I'm seeing a 48-hour call in the subject line, a deadline below of Tuesday May 3 (perhaps Sunday the 3rd, or Tuesday the 5th?), and I'd heard of a hoped-for publication date of today, April 30th and see that on the current editors' draft. I do have several concerns that I think should be addressed before the document is published for wide review, as I believe these could create misunderstandings as to expectations that W3C WAI may be setting with the broader community unless these are clarified first. Most of these concerns relate to AGWG's scope of oversight of the COGA TF rather than APA's, but given my uncertainty on the publication timeline, I wanted to bring these to APA's attention as well as AGWG's. First, it is great to see how far the document has come -- it is clearer throughout, and from my perspective has extensive amounts of useful information in an area that is greatly needed. Second, it is quite lengthy, and if APA and AGWG support putting this out for wide review, think that it is worth reading through, even if, with regard to substance, we may be relying on wide review to provide detailed feedback on the substance. My concerns are primarily with the abstract, and the policy section. * The abstract does not appear to adequately represent the scope or contents of the document, and it gives no indication of how this document relates to any other W3C WAI accessibility guidance. Unless the abstracted is clarified and updated, I think we would should expect confusion around whether this document is a replacement for part or all of WCAG 2.x ; whether it's an entirely non-matching set of new requirements that now double the compliance picture for groups seeking to conform to accessibility requirements; or some other relationship to WAI's existing accessibility guidance. Any of these could detract from the progress evident in this document. I therefore recommend clarifying and updating the abstract, including explaining the relationship to existing WAI guidance. * It is unusual to have policy recommendations embedded in a W3C technical report, and particularly unusual to have those in a Note-track document. The policy guidance that is suggested in Appendix C doesn't describe how this guidance relates to any existing WAI guidance, and I think it needs to before it goes for wide review so that misunderstandings don't emerge. Nevertheless, the content of the policy appendix appears useful and relevant, for instance highlighting how this guidance could be taken up in policies for emergency services. One possibility would be to move that section to a separate document; another would be provide more clarification of the intention of this section, or even adjust the name and tone of this appendix. (I'm wondering if "Considerations for uptake in different contexts" would be more accurate heading for this section.) But I think addressing this issue before publication would reduce chances of misunderstandings that may be difficult to walk back. Again, addressing these two concerns fall more under the purview of AGWG, but I think APA should be aware of these if you are each running a CfC ahead of First Public Working Draft publication. Thank you for your consideration, - Judy On 4/28/2020 3:39 PM, Janina Sajka (janina@rednote.net) wrote: > Colleagues: > > This is a Call for Consensus (CfC) to the Accessible Platform > Architectures (APA) Working Group proposing a second > wide review Draft publication of: > > Making Content Usable for People With Cognitive and Learning > Disabilities > > https://raw.githack.com/w3c/coga/changes-after-0327/content-usable/index.html > > This document has been in development over many years in our (joint) > Cognitive and Learning Disabilities (COGA) Task Force. We appreciate and > support their desire for a second wide review round before seeking to > finalize the document as a W3C Note. > > ***Action to Take*** > > This CfC is now open for objection, comment, as well as statements of > support via email. Silence will be interpreted as support, though > messages of support are certainly welcome. > > If you object to this proposed action, or have comments concerning this > proposal, please respond by replying on list to this message no later > than 23:59 (Midnight) Boston Time, Tuesday 3 May. > > IMPORTANT: If you have concerns or comments you believe should be > addressed before a public review publication, please note them in your > response on this thread but also please copy your comments to > public-coga-comments@w3.org. > > NOTE: This Call for Consensus is being conducted in accordance with the > APA Decision Policy published at: > > http://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/decision-policy > > As COGA is a joint Task Force of APA and of the Accessible Guidelines > Working Group (AGWG), a concurrent CfC is in process at AGWG. Members of > APA who are also members of AGWG are encouraged to be sure to register > their responses in both groups. > > Janina > -- Judy Brewer Director, Web Accessibility Initiative at the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) 105 Broadway, Room 7-128, MIT/CSAIL Cambridge MA 02142 USA www.w3.org/WAI/
Received on Thursday, 30 April 2020 05:23:19 UTC