- From: Tim Cole via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2017 23:17:00 +0000
- To: public-annotation@w3.org
I didn't see the ipr check issue initially, so I guess merging should wait for Ivan since I don't know what he does to fix that? As for the substance of the examples, interesting but now that I look more closely, are we stretching the scope of the Note a little too far? As it stands are these annotations or just uses of selectors to identify the sources of quotes - i.e., just instances of the ResourceSelection class as described in the Selector Note? If so, and given that the other examples are annotations, probably should be more explicit about this distinction in introducing these examples. But if others are also, I'm okay if we want to include examples of ResourceSelection class. It took me a bit to imagine what the json-ld for these examples would look like. Could we provide json-ld equivalents? Ivan's converter tool does a nice job with these, I think. And lastly, these are using Text Position Selector without State (which is recommended). Okay, but perhaps we should mention somewhere that a refinedBy could be added to align with the recommendation in the data model - albeit making everything more complicated (so let's not show). Presumably the document targeted is relatively static with no real dynamic content. Might need to say this too. -- GitHub Notification of comment by tcole3 Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/pull/400#issuecomment-275800618 using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 27 January 2017 23:17:06 UTC