Re: [web-annotation] Appendices in the vocab document should have been marked informative

After reading the discussion, the context can't be normative because 
the ontology definition isn't directly normative (the human readable 
form is).  However... the human readable form of the context IS 
normative (being TR/annotation-model, compared to TR/annotation-vocab 
for the ontology),  so it would be a bug if the non-normative context 
does not accurately represent the normative model, in the same way 
that the namespace not representing the normative vocab.


(FWIW, I'm also -0.9 on random working groups adding or modifying 
ontologies or contexts for that matter)

GitHub Notification of comment by azaroth42
Please view or discuss this issue at
 using your GitHub account

Received on Friday, 23 September 2016 19:29:32 UTC