- From: Rob Sanderson via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2016 19:29:25 +0000
- To: public-annotation@w3.org
After reading the discussion, the context can't be normative because the ontology definition isn't directly normative (the human readable form is). However... the human readable form of the context IS normative (being TR/annotation-model, compared to TR/annotation-vocab for the ontology), so it would be a bug if the non-normative context does not accurately represent the normative model, in the same way that the namespace not representing the normative vocab. Right? (FWIW, I'm also -0.9 on random working groups adding or modifying ontologies or contexts for that matter) -- GitHub Notification of comment by azaroth42 Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/354#issuecomment-249281972 using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 23 September 2016 19:29:32 UTC