Re: passAndSkip

Awesome - I will keep an eye out!

On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 4:39 PM, Timothy Cole <t-cole3@illinois.edu> wrote:

> Shane-
>
>
>
> I am putting in logic to skip unnecessary optional sub-feature tests when
> the parent feature is not implemented.
>
>
>
> This looks like it does cut down on the number of 'failed' tests that show
> in the runner test results – the skipped tests simply aren't run and so no
> results (good or bad) are generated for skipped tests. But I don't know
> exactly how the report generator will merge results files.
>
>
>
> To help find out, you should expect to see tomorrow a pull request with a
> test result for an annotation (similar to example 44) that implements all
> the major optional features (e.g., body, textual  body, specific
> resource, choice, agent) and a second test result for a minimal annotation
> that implements none of these features (and so none of the associated
> sub-features).  This will provide a way to see what the merged report
> looks like. Hopefully less red. (We will need to delete these 2 test
> results once we've learned.)
>
>
>
> Meanwhile, Janina tells me she has started on her pull request with
> updated results, but had to run off to another meeting.  Expect to see
> her new PR this evening or tomorrow.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> Tim Cole
>



-- 
Shane McCarron
Projects Manager, Spec-Ops