Re: Updated the /ns files

> On Oct 1, 2016, at 4:03 PM, Robert Sanderson <azaroth42@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> What RDFa? Where ever that is ... it should go away as we're not maintaining it! :)

You can see some particulars from my test results in the RESULDS.md file: https://github.com/Spec-Ops/web-platform-tests/blob/annotation-vocabulary-setup/annotation-vocab/tools/ruby-rdf/RESULTS.md

The HTML+RDFa is simply asserting the Respec triples:

  @prefix dc: <http://purl.org/dc/terms/> .
  @prefix foaf: <http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/> .
  @prefix oa: <http://www.w3.org/ns/oa#> .
  @prefix rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> .
  @prefix xhv: <http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml/vocab#> .
  @prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .

  <http://www.w3.org/ns/oa> dc:title "Web Annotation Ontology";
     <bibo:editor> [];
     xhv:license <http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/copyright-documents> .

  oa:respecDocument xhv:role xhv:document .

  oa:respecHeader xhv:role xhv:contentinfo .

  ([
     a foaf:Person;
     foaf:homepage <http://www.paolociccarese.info>;
     foaf:mbox <mailto:paolo.ciccarese@gmail.com>;
     foaf:name "Paolo Ciccarese"
   ] [
     a foaf:Person;
     foaf:homepage <http://bigbluehat.com/>;
     foaf:mbox <mailto:byoung@bigbluehat.com>;
     foaf:name "Benjamin Young"
   ]) .

  _:g70220666792480 a foaf:Person;
     foaf:homepage <http://www.stanford.edu/~azaroth/>;
     foaf:mbox <mailto:azaroth42@gmail.com>;
     foaf:name "Robert Sanderson";
     foaf:workplaceHomepage <http://www.stanford.edu/> .
Not a bug, unless you’re intending it to also provide the vocabulary; I simply reported it.

> And I don't see any difference between the content of the comments between RDF/XML and the other serializations.  If there is, it's a bug in rdflib as all three serializations are produced from the same graph.
> 
> See: https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/blob/gh-pages/vocab/wd/ontology/mk-ontology.py#L131-L139 <https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/blob/gh-pages/vocab/wd/ontology/mk-ontology.py#L131-L139>
> 
> Is it that the comment text is wrapped in a CDATA, and nokogiri is having a bad day?

Yeah, it seems to be that the comment for oa:annotationService is in CDATA. This is because the parser uses the text value of the element, and Nokogiri doesn’t show CDATA as text, but as a separate child node of type CDATA. The parser uses text nodes. It’s not clear to me from the RDF/XML spec how these are to be treated, but the RDFLib-based parser at http://rdf-translator.appspot.com handles it, so it’s arguably a bug in Nokogiri or the Ruby RDF/XML reader. Still, it’s a bit unusual to see CDATA used here.

In any case, this is simply informational, and if it’s doing what you expect, then you would seem to be clear.

> R
> 
> 
> On Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 1:03 PM, Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net <mailto:gregg@greggkellogg.net>> wrote:
> Yes, my tests for the context and expected results for turning annotations into RDF now all pass.
> 
> I do still note problems with the different ontology definitions, as they produce different triples. RDFa is not even close, RDF/XML is close to Turtle and JSON-LD, but has some minor differences.
> 
> The RDF/XML version of the vocabulary is not identical (even allowing for differences in literal whitespace) with the JSON-LD. This includes at least the rdfs:comment on oa:annotationService.
> 
> (This was noted in https://github.com/Spec-Ops/web-platform-tests/pull/8 <https://github.com/Spec-Ops/web-platform-tests/pull/8>).
> 
> I updated the results in the annotation-vocabulary-setup branch on GitHub.
> 
> Gregg Kellogg
> gregg@greggkellogg.net <mailto:gregg@greggkellogg.net>
> 
>> On Oct 1, 2016, at 11:44 AM, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org <mailto:ivan@w3.org>> wrote:
>> 
>> I made the changes at around 10am French time earlier today (Saturday)
>> 
>> Ivan
>> 
>> ---
>> Ivan Herman
>> Tel:+31 641044153 <tel:%2B31%20641044153>
>> http://www.ivan-herman.net <http://www.ivan-herman.net/>
>> 
>> (Written on mobile, sorry for brevity and misspellings...)
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 1 Oct 2016, at 19:59, Randall Leeds <randall@bleeds.info <mailto:randall@bleeds.info>> wrote:
>> 
>>> I don't know when you did it, but I was poking around these last night and they looked good. I was playing with the context in the JSON-LD playground last night.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Sat, Oct 1, 2016, 01:26 Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org <mailto:ivan@w3.org>> wrote:
>>> Ie, the ontology files (oa.{html,ttl,jsonld,rdf,owl}) as well as the jsonld context file (anno.{jsonld,json}).
>>> 
>>> A quick check from somebody would be good, just to be on the safe side!
>>> 
>>> (Thanks Rob for the fixes.)
>>> 
>>> Ivan
>>> 
>>> ----
>>> Ivan Herman, W3C
>>> Digital Publishing Technical Lead
>>> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ <http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/>
>>> mobile: +31-641044153 <tel:%2B31-641044153>
>>> ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704 <http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704>
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Rob Sanderson
> Semantic Architect
> The Getty Trust
> Los Angeles, CA 90049