- From: Robert Sanderson <azaroth42@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2016 16:03:16 -0700
- To: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>
- Cc: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, Randall Leeds <randall@bleeds.info>, W3C Public Annotation List <public-annotation@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CABevsUEYDybuu5kA0=wpHJVTKLi1UnQUKr6p-MPTUZ5mGaT8Ow@mail.gmail.com>
What RDFa? Where ever that is ... it should go away as we're not maintaining it! :) And I don't see any difference between the content of the comments between RDF/XML and the other serializations. If there is, it's a bug in rdflib as all three serializations are produced from the same graph. See: https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/blob/gh-pages/vocab/wd/ontology/mk-ontology.py#L131-L139 Is it that the comment text is wrapped in a CDATA, and nokogiri is having a bad day? R On Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 1:03 PM, Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net> wrote: > Yes, my tests for the context and expected results for turning annotations > into RDF now all pass. > > I do still note problems with the different ontology definitions, as they > produce different triples. RDFa is not even close, RDF/XML is close to > Turtle and JSON-LD, but has some minor differences. > > The RDF/XML version of the vocabulary is not identical (even allowing for > differences in literal whitespace) with the JSON-LD. This includes at least > the rdfs:comment on oa:annotationService. > > (This was noted in https://github.com/Spec-Ops/web-platform-tests/pull/8). > > I updated the results in the annotation-vocabulary-setup branch on GitHub. > > Gregg Kellogg > gregg@greggkellogg.net > > On Oct 1, 2016, at 11:44 AM, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote: > > I made the changes at around 10am French time earlier today (Saturday) > > Ivan > > --- > Ivan Herman > Tel:+31 641044153 > http://www.ivan-herman.net > > (Written on mobile, sorry for brevity and misspellings...) > > > > On 1 Oct 2016, at 19:59, Randall Leeds <randall@bleeds.info> wrote: > > I don't know when you did it, but I was poking around these last night and > they looked good. I was playing with the context in the JSON-LD playground > last night. > > On Sat, Oct 1, 2016, 01:26 Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote: > >> Ie, the ontology files (oa.{html,ttl,jsonld,rdf,owl}) as well as the >> jsonld context file (anno.{jsonld,json}). >> >> A quick check from somebody would be good, just to be on the safe side! >> >> (Thanks Rob for the fixes.) >> >> Ivan >> >> ---- >> Ivan Herman, W3C >> Digital Publishing Technical Lead >> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ >> mobile: +31-641044153 >> ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704 >> >> >> >> >> > -- Rob Sanderson Semantic Architect The Getty Trust Los Angeles, CA 90049
Received on Saturday, 1 October 2016 23:03:45 UTC