Re: Annotation Model Reports updated

Actually, in one case the test failed to run and I didn't notice it.  I
will update that.  Also I note that the tests are not sorting in the right
order in the report so I need to look into that. I have some nonsense today
but I will try to work around it.

On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 11:02 AM, Shane McCarron <shane@spec-ops.io> wrote:

> Yeah I noticed that things seemed wrong. I also noticed that the tests on
> w3c-test.org are NOT the same as the ones on my server.  And the ones on
> my server are from the PR I am sure we submitted so... I have no idea what
> is going on.
>
> On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 2:48 PM, Robert Sanderson <azaroth42@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>> Collection Musts 1:3 seems buggy.  Everyone suddenly started failing
>> AnnotationCollection in the type of the Collection?
>> Also Page Musts 1:2 through 1:8 ... same deal.
>>
>> Then the page optionals I think are wrong too ... I know that my
>> implementation has partOf, next and prev which aren't in the table.
>>
>> Finally total isn't a property of a Page, it's a property of the
>> Collection, and thus shouldn't be tested (page optionals 1:7)
>>
>> Rob
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 12:31 PM, Shane McCarron <shane@spec-ops.io>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I re-ran the tests using an automated script against the latest tests.
>>> I also integrated the new inputs from Janina J.  The reports are at [1]
>>>
>>> [1] https://w3c.github.io/test-results/annotation-model/all.html
>>>
>>> --
>>> Shane McCarron
>>> Projects Manager, Spec-Ops
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Rob Sanderson
>> Semantic Architect
>> The Getty Trust
>> Los Angeles, CA 90049
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Shane McCarron
> Projects Manager, Spec-Ops
>



-- 
Shane McCarron
Projects Manager, Spec-Ops