W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-annotation@w3.org > November 2016

Re: RN Annotation Results integrated

From: Shane McCarron <shane@spec-ops.io>
Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2016 11:12:43 -0600
Message-ID: <CAJdbnOBuoMeDqzqeacrKDDjLgycOKe_q5uhwtwVKpOFWJmnu6Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Cc: Tim Cole <t-cole3@illinois.edu>, W3C Public Annotation List <public-annotation@w3.org>
Okay...  Maybe in the README block about the various implementations that
are in the report.  I will see if I can do something useful.

On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 12:54 PM, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote:

>
> On 18 Nov 2016, at 10:43, Cole, Timothy W <t-cole3@illinois.edu> wrote:
>
> Section 5 of the Annotation Model Rec models and specifies requirements
> for Annotation Collections and Annotation Pages.  In practice these are
> only being created right now by those implementing the Protocol, so
> Protocol implementers are also the only ones who are implementing Section 5
> of the Annotation Model Rec. So the Protocol implementations will appear
> also in the model implementation report, albeit typically only with regard
> to Section 5.
>
>
> O.k. I propose that this should be put somewhere as an explanation when we
> go to the PR Transition call
>
> I.
>
>
> -Tim Cole
>
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Ivan Herman [ivan@w3.org]
> *Sent:* Friday, November 18, 2016 12:23
> *To:* Shane McCarron
> *Cc:* W3C Public Annotation List
> *Subject:* Re: RN Annotation Results integrated
>
>
> On 18 Nov 2016, at 10:19, Shane McCarron <shane@spec-ops.io> wrote:
>
> Normal?  Perhaps not.  I mean - remember the RI is ONLY a protocol server,
> so it serves up pages and a container.  That is what is being tested.  Not
> annotations.  It is not a client.
>
>
> I am not sure I understand. RI appears in the model report, ie, if it is
> in the protocol only, then it should not appear in the model report…
>
> I.
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 8:31 AM, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote:
>
>> Great!
>>
>> But… is it normal to have a 'reference implementation' with a fully
>> yellow entries?
>>
>> Ivan
>>
>> On 17 Nov 2016, at 14:51, Shane McCarron <shane@spec-ops.io> wrote:
>>
>> Another implementation in the report at [1]!
>>
>> [1] https://w3c.github.io/test-results/annotation-model/all.html
>>
>> --
>> Shane McCarron
>> Projects Manager, Spec-Ops
>>
>>
>>
>> ----
>> Ivan Herman, W3C
>> Digital Publishing Technical Lead
>> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
>> mobile: +31-641044153
>> ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Shane McCarron
> Projects Manager, Spec-Ops
>
>
>
> ----
> Ivan Herman, W3C
> Digital Publishing Technical Lead
> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
> mobile: +31-641044153
> ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704
>
>
>
> ----
> Ivan Herman, W3C
> Digital Publishing Technical Lead
> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
> mobile: +31-641044153
> ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704
>
>
>
>
>


-- 
Shane McCarron
Projects Manager, Spec-Ops
Received on Saturday, 19 November 2016 17:13:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:54:50 UTC