- From: Shane McCarron <shane@spec-ops.io>
- Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2016 11:12:43 -0600
- To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Cc: Tim Cole <t-cole3@illinois.edu>, W3C Public Annotation List <public-annotation@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAJdbnOBuoMeDqzqeacrKDDjLgycOKe_q5uhwtwVKpOFWJmnu6Q@mail.gmail.com>
Okay... Maybe in the README block about the various implementations that are in the report. I will see if I can do something useful. On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 12:54 PM, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote: > > On 18 Nov 2016, at 10:43, Cole, Timothy W <t-cole3@illinois.edu> wrote: > > Section 5 of the Annotation Model Rec models and specifies requirements > for Annotation Collections and Annotation Pages. In practice these are > only being created right now by those implementing the Protocol, so > Protocol implementers are also the only ones who are implementing Section 5 > of the Annotation Model Rec. So the Protocol implementations will appear > also in the model implementation report, albeit typically only with regard > to Section 5. > > > O.k. I propose that this should be put somewhere as an explanation when we > go to the PR Transition call > > I. > > > -Tim Cole > > > ------------------------------ > *From:* Ivan Herman [ivan@w3.org] > *Sent:* Friday, November 18, 2016 12:23 > *To:* Shane McCarron > *Cc:* W3C Public Annotation List > *Subject:* Re: RN Annotation Results integrated > > > On 18 Nov 2016, at 10:19, Shane McCarron <shane@spec-ops.io> wrote: > > Normal? Perhaps not. I mean - remember the RI is ONLY a protocol server, > so it serves up pages and a container. That is what is being tested. Not > annotations. It is not a client. > > > I am not sure I understand. RI appears in the model report, ie, if it is > in the protocol only, then it should not appear in the model report… > > I. > > > On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 8:31 AM, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote: > >> Great! >> >> But… is it normal to have a 'reference implementation' with a fully >> yellow entries? >> >> Ivan >> >> On 17 Nov 2016, at 14:51, Shane McCarron <shane@spec-ops.io> wrote: >> >> Another implementation in the report at [1]! >> >> [1] https://w3c.github.io/test-results/annotation-model/all.html >> >> -- >> Shane McCarron >> Projects Manager, Spec-Ops >> >> >> >> ---- >> Ivan Herman, W3C >> Digital Publishing Technical Lead >> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ >> mobile: +31-641044153 >> ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704 >> >> >> >> >> > > > -- > Shane McCarron > Projects Manager, Spec-Ops > > > > ---- > Ivan Herman, W3C > Digital Publishing Technical Lead > Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ > mobile: +31-641044153 > ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704 > > > > ---- > Ivan Herman, W3C > Digital Publishing Technical Lead > Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ > mobile: +31-641044153 > ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704 > > > > > -- Shane McCarron Projects Manager, Spec-Ops
Received on Saturday, 19 November 2016 17:13:42 UTC