W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-annotation@w3.org > November 2016

Test results updated

From: Shane McCarron <shane@spec-ops.io>
Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2016 12:09:04 -0500
Message-ID: <CAJdbnOCbFBXbA+_Ao=pi644DSHbRU0JYcZEHs-ka8or0kS5wNA@mail.gmail.com>
To: W3C Public Annotation List <public-annotation@w3.org>
As per our discussions today, I got the PN input from Rob, split it into
its 5 separate input files, then re-ran the tests for them.  The results
are in the repo at [1].  I note that all of their inputs are missing
@context.  I wonder if it would be legit for us to add that into their
input?  Perhaps it is implied in their environment?

[1] https://w3c.github.io/test-results/annotation-model/all.html
-- 
Shane McCarron
Projects Manager, Spec-Ops
Received on Friday, 4 November 2016 17:10:04 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:54:50 UTC