- From: gsergiu via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2016 14:56:36 +0000
- To: public-annotation@w3.org
@BigBlueHat ok ... I see it now. Thank you for the reference. I assume you mean: > "canonical": "urn:uuid:dbfb1861-0ecf-41ad-be94-a584e5c4f1df" I would just want to emphasize that I was talking about the `@id` of the Web Resources, which is a MUST for web resources. According to my understanding, the Web Reources must have an `@id` that I would like to be deferencable (all), and might have an alternative cannonical URN, which is optional. If the definition of the Web Resources would say that the resources must have an IRI (`@id`) or a cannonical urn I would agree that your argument is enough to close the ticket. But according to my understanding this is not the case. My judgement might be correct or wrong, I'll let you to decide on which side of the truth my affirmation lays. -- GitHub Notification of comment by gsergiu Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/372#issuecomment-258166617 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 3 November 2016 14:56:42 UTC