W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-annotation@w3.org > November 2016

Re: [web-annotation] Web resources SHOULD be dereferencable via their IRI

From: gsergiu via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2016 14:56:36 +0000
To: public-annotation@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-258166617-1478184994-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
ok ... I see it now. Thank you for the reference.
I assume you mean:

> "canonical": "urn:uuid:dbfb1861-0ecf-41ad-be94-a584e5c4f1df"

I would just want to emphasize that I was talking about the `@id` of 
the Web Resources, which is a MUST for web resources. 

According to my understanding, the Web Reources must have an `@id` 
that I would like to be deferencable (all), and might have an 
alternative cannonical URN, which is optional.

If the definition of the Web Resources would say that the resources 
must have an IRI (`@id`) or a cannonical urn I would agree that your 
argument is enough to close the ticket. But according to my 
understanding this is not the case.
My judgement might be correct or wrong, I'll let you to decide on 
which side of the truth my affirmation lays.  

GitHub Notification of comment by gsergiu
Please view or discuss this issue at 
 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 3 November 2016 14:56:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:54:50 UTC