- From: Ivan Herman via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 05:48:45 +0000
- To: public-annotation@w3.org
> On 21 Jan 2016, at 00:08, Rob Sanderson <notifications@github.com> wrote: > > to terminology section and back ref from 4.1 to 3.3. > > Not so keen on the index -- that seems like the vocab doc repeated in the model doc. > Would be much less formal. A bit like the table in the CSS spec: a list of classes and terms, linked back to the places where they are defined. The example on 'purpose', and my misunderstanding, shows that the plural in 'places' is important… Again, it is not necessarily for this round. But I think it would be useful on the long run. > Perhaps we can link to examples in model from vocab? > That is a good idea in any case, but that is a different issue; JSON users will not (necessarily) look at the vocab document. -- GitHub Notification of comment by iherman Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/142#issuecomment-173464122 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 21 January 2016 05:48:52 UTC