W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-annotation@w3.org > January 2016

Re: [web-annotation] Restriction on 'purpose'

From: Ivan Herman via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 05:48:45 +0000
To: public-annotation@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-173464122-1453355324-sysbot+gh@w3.org>

> On 21 Jan 2016, at 00:08, Rob Sanderson <notifications@github.com> 
wrote:
> 
>  to terminology section and back ref from 4.1 to 3.3.
> 
> Not so keen on the index -- that seems like the vocab doc repeated 
in the model doc.
> 
Would be much less formal. A bit like the table in the CSS spec: a 
list of classes and terms, linked back to the places where they are 
defined. The example on 'purpose', and my misunderstanding, shows that
 the plural in 'places' is important…

Again, it is not necessarily for this round. But I think it would be 
useful on the long run.
> Perhaps we can link to examples in model from vocab?
> 
That is a good idea in any case, but that is a different issue; JSON 
users will not (necessarily) look at the vocab document.






-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by iherman
Please view or discuss this issue at 
https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/142#issuecomment-173464122
 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 21 January 2016 05:48:52 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:54:43 UTC