- From: Jacob via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 16:36:46 +0000
- To: public-annotation@w3.org
@azaroth42 I see the points you're making. I agree with your final one that identity debates are not something we need to have here. +1 for dropping Composite from the model. Counter proposal for Choice and List. Remove Choice and List from model and refer implementers to activity stream's ordered collections via non-normative best practice documentation as both choice and list seem out of scope for annotations per se. One of the issues I'm stumbling with is consistency of approach. For Composites you say, "I disagree that there is any implication that a consuming software agent will combine resources in a Composite in any way that they might not also do for a List." However your expectation for Choice is precisely the opposite. Thus the need to differentiate it from a List. I hate to sound unreasonable but this approach only meets the needs of certain community members. Since, on the whole, I think this is a Containers issue, I think the whole matter is out of scope for us and better left for a group dedicated to looking at Containers and combinatorial expectations. -- GitHub Notification of comment by jjett Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/92#issuecomment-172909534 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 19 January 2016 16:36:48 UTC