- From: Ivan Herman via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 06:14:24 +0000
- To: public-annotation@w3.org
@tilgovi my issue has never been technical on this but more "social". Per RDF spec, there is nothing that forbids the development of a vocabulary over several documents and communities, just as there nothing that forbids conceptually carving out part of a vocabulary for a different or restricted use. But whether these are socially good or acceptable is a totally different matter. To take a different example (which we are not talking about here, just to illustrate the point): a vocabulary ``A`` may contain the predicate ``a:pred``. Technically, it is possible in a vocabulary ``B`` to make a statement ``` a:pred rdfs:subPropertyOf b:mypred ``` but this is considered to be very bad practice, also referred to as "property hijacking". It is a social thing, though, not technical. B.t.w., we are not talking about the first case in this issue (vocabulary over several document) but more the second (carving out a vocabulary) -- GitHub Notification of comment by iherman Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/110#issuecomment-171543230 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 14 January 2016 06:14:32 UTC