- From: gsergiu via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2016 17:44:03 +0000
- To: public-annotation@w3.org
Well … I think that the trick with “should” and “must” is used enough in the document to leave the standard open for extension, even if in 90+% percent of cases a standard representation will be used. I don’t know which are the mechanisms to separate the normative from non-normative part of the standard. But I think that at list of “non normative” Note would be more than welcome for those who implement the standard. BR, Sergiu Von: Rob Sanderson [mailto:notifications@github.com] Gesendet: Dienstag, 12. Januar 2016 17:53 An: w3c/web-annotation Cc: Gordea Sergiu Betreff: Re: [web-annotation] Language should use the Language Tags Vocabulary (#134) As per comment on #133<https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/133>, those documents are also not good normative references. Again, happy to be corrected :) — Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub<https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/134#issuecomment-170971943>. -- GitHub Notification of comment by gsergiu Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/134#issuecomment-170987444 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 12 January 2016 17:44:06 UTC