- From: BigBlueHat via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2016 18:45:59 +0000
- To: public-annotation@w3.org
:+1: for `canonical`! I was wondering about the publish offline first
scenario with regards to `id` and `via`.
I think it would look like:
Offline:
```json
{
"id": "urn:uuid:1234-567...",
"target": "http://...."
}
```
Published online later:
```json
{
"id": "http://annotations.example/blah-blah",
"canonical": "urn:uuid:1234-567...",
"target": "http://...."
}
```
Aggregated elsewhere:
Published online later:
```json
{
"id": "http://other.example/blah-blah-again",
"via": ["http://annotations.example/blah-blah"],
"canonical": "urn:uuid:1234-567...",
"target": "http://...."
}
```
Does that make sense?
Should the (offline) first example also re-state it's `id` in the
`canonical` value--and if so, should that be a requirement? Thought
being that if it were already there, then future systems MUST leave it
alone and MUST move the value of `id` to the `via`
breadcrumb/chain/thing.
Other than that question, I think this thing sings pretty sweetly now.
:notes: :bird:
--
GitHub Notification of comment by BigBlueHat
Please view or discuss this issue at
https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/21#issuecomment-170649433
using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 11 January 2016 18:46:02 UTC