- From: Ivan Herman via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2016 05:39:56 +0000
- To: public-annotation@w3.org
Great. A minor issue that may (but hopefully will not!) come up we will ever use OWL to express things. Indeed, in that case a class MAY be a blank node (defined through OWL expressions) which would complicate things: a class may be 'just' a resource, not necessarily a web resource. But, at the moment, this is irrelevant and, hopefully, it will stay so… Just flagging this for our own memory. > On 26 Feb 2016, at 20:27, Rob Sanderson <notifications@github.com> wrote: > > I've copied over the vast majority: > http://w3c.github.io/web-annotation/model/wd2/#terminology <http://w3c.github.io/web-annotation/model/wd2/#terminology> > Other than the bits I commented on above. > Thanks Ivan! > -- GitHub Notification of comment by iherman Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/pull/181#issuecomment-189579982 using your GitHub account
Received on Saturday, 27 February 2016 05:39:57 UTC