- From: Jacob via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 14:33:52 +0000
- To: public-annotation@w3.org
+1 from me for @azaroth42 's proposed fix. Still not certain about how the semantics for oa:hasSubSelector and oa:hasSubState work. They both nest below the object of oa:hasSelector (or oa:hasState, as the case may be) and the object of oa:hasSubSelector (i.e., subselectors can an infinitely deep nest of recursions but not the case for selectors, the semantics don't seem consistent). -- GitHub Notification of comment by jjett Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/110#issuecomment-189305559 using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 26 February 2016 14:33:54 UTC