Re: [web-annotation] Using xsd:date, too, in the model?

> On 19 Feb 2016, at 20:08, Rob Sanderson <notifications@github.com> 
wrote:
> 
> In starting to write this up I ran into a problem ... we use 
prov:generatedAtTime for generated, and it has an explicit range of 
xsd:dateTime (https://www.w3.org/TR/prov-o/#generatedAtTime 
<https://www.w3.org/TR/prov-o/#generatedAtTime>)
> 
> In order to consistently adopt w3cdtf, we would need to avoid the 
use of generatedAtTime.
> 
I am not so concerned. It is a balancing act: do we want to make use 
of the Prov vocabulary in general or not? If yes, than we can live 
with this inconsistency.

> The range of created and modified are rdfs:Literal, which does work 
with w3cdtf.
> 
> Perhaps we could use dcterms:issued for generated? 
http://dublincore.org/documents/dcmi-terms/#terms-issued 
<http://dublincore.org/documents/dcmi-terms/#terms-issued> (and keep 
the generated json key) Retagging as telco.
> 
> 

If we do not want to to stick with the prov vocabulary, that this 
indeed a good alternative.

I think this is a minor issue that we may be able to handle by email, 
without using telco time (let us reserve telco for the tougher 
issues…)




-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by iherman
Please view or discuss this issue at 
https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/141#issuecomment-186541126
 using your GitHub account

Received on Saturday, 20 February 2016 08:07:05 UTC