- From: Ivan Herman via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 17:40:52 +0000
- To: public-annotation@w3.org
Works for me. > On 19 Feb 2016, at 18:38, Rob Sanderson <notifications@github.com> wrote: > > To try and characterize the discussion today, and please correct me if you disagree: > > There was general agreement that the proposal is better than the status quo of using explicit Choice and List nodes > There was general agreement that the proposal is better than the "inverse" proposal, where SpecificResources are used as the source of other SpecificResources. > There was a new proposal that any structure is unnecessary > In order to keep up forward momentum, I propose for the next call that we accept this particular issue and #135 <https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/135> as an improvement on the status quo. We can then in a separate issue discuss the new proposal to remove the functionality. As the Multiplicity section needs reworking anyway given the discussion around lists, I'm happy to write up the proposal (once resolved) and then take it out again if that's the resolution of the new issue. > > Does that work for everyone? > > — > -- GitHub Notification of comment by iherman Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/93#issuecomment-186322235 using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 19 February 2016 17:40:54 UTC