- From: elf Pavlik via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 19:14:15 +0000
- To: public-annotation@w3.org
Just to double check my interpretation of [as:OrderedCollection](https://www.w3.org/TR/activitystreams-vocabulary/#dfn-orderedcollection) and [as:OrderedCollectionPage](https://www.w3.org/TR/activitystreams-vocabulary/#dfn-orderedcollectionpage) which I understand Web Annotations will use. https://www.w3.org/TR/activitystreams-core/#collections Each page uses [as:partOf](https://www.w3.org/TR/activitystreams-vocabulary/#dfn-partof) to reference collection which got 'broken into pages'. Each page also uses [as:items](https://www.w3.org/TR/activitystreams-vocabulary/#dfn-items) to reference each item/member of the particular OrderedCollection**Page**. In that case each item/member DOES NOT have a relationship with the whole OrderedCollection which one can express with a single predicate/property defined in AS 2.0 Vocabulary . Expressing relationship between the instance of as:PagedCollection and each item/member seems to require combining two properties: (owl:inverseOf) as:partOf and as:items. In such case, maybe it would make sense to define [owl:propertyChainAxiom](https://www.w3.org/TR/2012/REC-owl2-primer-20121211/#a_SubObjectPropertyOfChain). In other words, as:(Ordered)Collection has **either** items/members or pages, but when it has pages it doesn't have any item/member directly, than only each page has item/member directly. -- GitHub Notification of comment by elf-pavlik Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/50#issuecomment-184351075 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 15 February 2016 19:14:17 UTC