Re: [web-annotation] Updates for PR

> On 21 Dec 2016, at 19:10, Rob Sanderson <notifications@github.com> 
wrote:
> 
> I looked at other Proposed Recs (eg dwbp) and they didn't have exit 
criteria, so I took them out. I can put them back (just cut/paste), 
but I assume that for TR we'll take them out again, and compress the 
change history to only be differences with the CG's version?
> 
Actually, the PR and the Rec should not differ from one another except
 for spelling mistakes and the obvious status texts.

I would certainly keep the changes' section as is, and not compress 
it. It is part of the document's history. So is the CR exit criteria 
appendix.

I would propose to keep it that way. We can then ask Philippe & Ralph 
for advise on this; if they refer to take those out, then _I_ will do 
it before the PR publication, because I was the one asking for it. Is 
this a fair deal? ;-)

> There shouldn't be a reference to them in the status section though?
 Just the appendix?
> 

Indeed. I was only referring to the relevant appendix.




-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by iherman
Please view or discuss this issue at 
https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/pull/390#issuecomment-268599689 
using your GitHub account

Received on Wednesday, 21 December 2016 18:19:36 UTC