W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-annotation@w3.org > December 2016

Re: [web-annotation] Updates for PR

From: Ivan Herman via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 18:19:29 +0000
To: public-annotation@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-268599689-1482344367-sysbot+gh@w3.org>

> On 21 Dec 2016, at 19:10, Rob Sanderson <notifications@github.com> 
> I looked at other Proposed Recs (eg dwbp) and they didn't have exit 
criteria, so I took them out. I can put them back (just cut/paste), 
but I assume that for TR we'll take them out again, and compress the 
change history to only be differences with the CG's version?
Actually, the PR and the Rec should not differ from one another except
 for spelling mistakes and the obvious status texts.

I would certainly keep the changes' section as is, and not compress 
it. It is part of the document's history. So is the CR exit criteria 

I would propose to keep it that way. We can then ask Philippe & Ralph 
for advise on this; if they refer to take those out, then _I_ will do 
it before the PR publication, because I was the one asking for it. Is 
this a fair deal? ;-)

> There shouldn't be a reference to them in the status section though?
 Just the appendix?

Indeed. I was only referring to the relevant appendix.

GitHub Notification of comment by iherman
Please view or discuss this issue at 
using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 21 December 2016 18:19:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:54:51 UTC