Re: Privacy review request: Web Annotation model and protocol

Christine,

thank you.

Personally I can make it, but that is obviously not enough:-) We will discuss this on the group to find out who can make it on the call, and we will get back to you soon.

Thanks again

Ivan

> On 1 Apr 2016, at 23:41, Christine Runnegar <runnegar@isoc.org> wrote:
> 
> Thank you very much Greg.
> 
> Ivan, PING will have its next teleconference on 28 April 2016 at UTC 16.
> 
> We would be happy to invite you and your colleagues in the Web Annotation WG to join us. This would give you an opportunity to introduce the specifications and discuss any privacy considerations that emerge as a result of Greg’s and others’ review.
> 
> Would this be useful?
> 
> Kind regards,
> Christine (PING co-chair)
> 
>> On 1 Apr 2016, at 5:34 PM, Greg Norcie <gnorcie@cdt.org> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Ivan,
>> 
>> I'll take a look using the Ping Privacy Questionaire[1] and send you some feedback.
>> 
>> http://gregnorc.github.io/ping-privacy-questions/
>> 
>> (I'll also be editing the questionnaire based on this test run and emailing out a summary of changes in a separate email to PING)
>> <signature.asc>
> 


----
Ivan Herman, W3C
Digital Publishing Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704

Received on Saturday, 2 April 2016 07:18:53 UTC