- From: Benjamin Goering via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 06:58:33 +0000
- To: public-annotation@w3.org
`intent` (+1) is good for this, and my vote. It is intuitive and, in my opinion, the least ambiguous of the options presented so far. IMO it's good that it's similar to Web Intents. In fact, the Web Intents API would actually be a pretty good inspiration for a Client Side API for some annotation use cases (e.g. 'leave a comment' or 'correct this article' buttons). Regardless of whether you agree with that last paragraph, the Web Intents document is just a note that that task force (not WG) decided not to advance anyway. It's essentially abandoned by w3, so I don't think we should avoid this particular six-character word just because some other folks also thought it was relevant to interacting with the web. -- GitHub Notification of comment by gobengo Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/112#issuecomment-159518807 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 25 November 2015 06:58:35 UTC