- From: Ivan Herman via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2015 09:22:14 +0000
- To: public-annotation@w3.org
> On 6 Nov 2015, at 00:28, Rob Sanderson <notifications@github.com> wrote: > > While I agree with all of the content, I don't see that it justifies the addition of an annotates predicate in RDF to be described in the model? The existence of the Annotation resource implies all of that, no? > +1. I do not think we should touch the model > Conversely, a Link header on the response from a resource that is the Body of an Annotation like: > > Link: <http://example.org/target1>;rel="annotates";describedBy="http://example.org/anno1" > Could be very useful for discovery. Shall we close this issue and reframe in a new one? > Yes. This seems to be orthogonal to almost everything we do (even the protocol): it is about registering a rel value for the purpose of HTTP (I am not sure how that happens administratively). It sounds like a good idea, and probably very little investment -- GitHub Notif of comment by iherman See https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/101#issuecomment-154353183
Received on Friday, 6 November 2015 09:22:16 UTC