Re: [web-annotation] Should Annotation concept and document be distinguished?

... And also an owl ontology file to edit?

Professor Luc Moreau
Electronics and Computer Science
University of Southampton 
Southampton SO17 1BJ
United Kingdom

> On 19 Feb 2015, at 02:21, Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote:
> 
> Hi Rob, all
> 
> Happy to look into this.
> 
> Any chance I could get prov mapping image in svg to edit it?
> 
> Professor Luc Moreau
> Electronics and Computer Science
> University of Southampton 
> Southampton SO17 1BJ
> United Kingdom
> 
>> On 18 Feb 2015, at 22:02, Rob Sanderson via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org> wrote:
>> 
>> @lucmoreau Could you propose a solution?
>> 
>> The options that occur to me:
>> * Simply drop the subPropertyOf relationship to prov for 
>> serializedBy/At.  This doesn't feel clean.
>> * Split the annotation node to always refer to the concept and then 
>> not require a node in the graph for the document.  So if you want to 
>> give serializedBy/At you have a new node that otherwise isn't present.
>> We could then just use the prov terms directly. This feels cleaner 
>> .... but a lot more expensive when the information should be captured.
>> 
>> Also discussed on the call today was:
>> * Drop serializedBy/At completely, but this was not viewed 
>> favorably.
>> 
>> Thanks!
>> 
>> -- 
>> GitHub Notif of comment by azaroth42
>> See 
>> https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/10#issuecomment-74957466
>> 
>> 

Received on Thursday, 19 February 2015 02:34:36 UTC