W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-annotation@w3.org > December 2015

Re: [web-annotation] MIME Type for Annotation Model

From: Ivan Herman via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 18:50:00 +0000
To: public-annotation@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-165209221-1450291800-sysbot+gh@w3.org>

> On 16 Dec 2015, at 18:59, Doug Schepers <notifications@github.com> 
> The proposals miss the actual current proposal of using a profile: 
the media type 
> would be 
> Where was this proposal made? Is it implicit in #30? If so, then it 
should be made more explicit. (During the telcon, the response to my 
question was that the MIME type is orthogonal to the profile 
suggestion in #30.)

It *is* proposal #30. That is what profile means, as I also explained 
on the call. That is what we voted on. 

The question is whether there would be *another* mime type.


GitHub Notification of comment by iherman
Please view or discuss this issue at 
 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 16 December 2015 18:50:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:54:43 UTC