W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-annotation@w3.org > December 2015

Re: [web-annotation] MIME Type for Annotation Model

From: Doug Schepers via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 17:42:14 +0000
To: public-annotation@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-165188971-1450287732-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
> :-1: to multiple media types.

I wasn't proposing multiple media types, I was proposing a single 
media type that isn't `application/ld+json`.

> All of the pros listed are possible with a profile, and we can have 
an annotation 
> file type associated with the profile (Verified with IETF already, 
following on from TPAC).
> The proposals miss the actual current proposal of using a profile: 
the media type 
> would be 

Interesting. That's pretty clumsy, but maybe it will work. How well 
are MIME Type profiles understood by the average developer (this is 
the first I've heard of them)? What's the rationale to use a profile 
rather than a dedicated MIME type?

> Proposal 3 is an illegal media type, as there MUST NOT be more than 
one + according to the RFC.

Okay, thanks. That suggestion was by Manu in a hallway conversation, 
but I should have researched it better.

GitHub Notification of comment by shepazu
Please view or discuss this issue at 
 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 16 December 2015 17:42:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:54:43 UTC