- From: Ivan Herman via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 10:38:21 +0000
- To: public-annotation@w3.org
@tilgovi what I proposed, as a possible consensus, is: 1. produce a *Note* (ie, no Recommendation) on the usage of selectors as an isolated entity, possibly also with a proposal for a fragment ID 2. to make the previous approach a bit more tangible even for RDF users, put the selector terms into a different namespace (with a possible superclass structure, see [my previous](https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/110#issuecomment-160566248) comment). This means that we do not have to get buy-in from implementors right away officially, although implementations may decide to use this (at their own risk, in some sense). But it would mean a stake in the ground. Ie, this goes along the lines of what you propose I believe. I have the impression at least that there is no strong push back on (1) above. @azaroth seems to be against (2). -- GitHub Notification of comment by iherman Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/110#issuecomment-163573384 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 10 December 2015 10:38:26 UTC