> On 4 Dec 2015, at 00:17, Benjamin Young <bigbluehat@hypothes.is> wrote: > > I'd say (and possibly cite) `@graph` for this use case. > I would say: let us not go there. This translates into named graphs in RDF (well, the official terms in RDF datasets) that cannot formally be expressed using a Turtle syntax (ie, forces us to update the RDF document), etc. I am still not sure what we want to achieve with this and there does not seem to be an overwhelming demand. I would close it for now. Ivan > That requires since JSON-LD knowledge, but really that the only safe way to extend this anyhow. Otherwise key conflicts are likely... or we'd build @graph again...just diffurnt. :wink: > > On Dec 2, 2015 4:45 PM, "Rob Sanderson via GitHub" <sysbot+gh@w3.org <mailto:sysbot%2Bgh@w3.org>> wrote: > Is anyone willing to champion this issue and make a concrete proposal, > or shall we close it? > > -- > GitHub Notification of comment by azaroth42 > Please view or discuss this issue at > https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/86#issuecomment-161443180 <https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/86#issuecomment-161443180> > using your GitHub account > ---- Ivan Herman, W3C Digital Publishing Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ mobile: +31-641044153 ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704
Received on Friday, 4 December 2015 09:16:38 UTC