- From: Ivan Herman via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2015 05:59:03 +0000
- To: public-annotation@w3.org
To be honest, I am a little bit lost in this discussion. We agreed to use the schema.org/Audience class. It has a bunch of subclasses defined by schema.org, these can (and I presume will) evolve in future but, luckily, we do not manage those changes. But already at this point, the Audience class[1] is pretty open to be used for many different things; and instance can use the `audienceType` property whose value is any text, and that can be used to model any collection of users, a.k.a. groups in this sense. What this tells me is that the non-authorization and non-access-control aspect of a group can be modeled by Audience, ie, by what we have accepted to use. That part is done. We also agreed that authorization and access control is out of scope in the model, and mostly out of scope for the Working Group altogether. Bottom line: I do not know what we are missing and what we are really discussing. My feeling is that there is simply no issue to solve here. [1] https://schema.org/Audience -- GitHub Notification of comment by iherman Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/119#issuecomment-161524850 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 3 December 2015 05:59:06 UTC