Re: [web-annotation] How do we model "groups" in the Annotation model?

To be honest, I am a little bit lost in this discussion.

We agreed to use the schema.org/Audience class. It has a bunch of 
subclasses defined by schema.org, these can (and I presume will) 
evolve in future but, luckily, we do not manage those changes. But 
already at this point, the Audience class[1] is pretty open to be used
 for many different things; and instance can use the `audienceType` 
property whose value is any text, and that can be used to model any 
collection of users, a.k.a. groups in this sense. What this tells me 
is that the non-authorization and non-access-control aspect of a group
 can be modeled by Audience, ie, by what we have accepted to use. That
 part is done.

We also agreed that authorization and access control is out of scope 
in the model, and mostly out of scope for the Working Group 
altogether.

Bottom line: I do not know what we are missing and what we are really 
discussing. My feeling is that there is simply no issue to solve here.
 


[1] https://schema.org/Audience




-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by iherman
Please view or discuss this issue at 
https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/119#issuecomment-161524850
 using your GitHub account

Received on Thursday, 3 December 2015 05:59:06 UTC