Re: [web-annotation] Require dct:Text class for interpretation of literal bodies

Currently the usage of a literal body is ambiguous as to whether the 
text is a comment or a tag, leaving implementers to guess based on 
motivations and heuristics.  This would make it explicit that a 
literal body is *always* a comment and never a tag.  The reason why 
motivation is insufficient is that there can be multiple bodies on an 
annotation, all could be literals, with a mixture of comments and 
tags:

```
{
  "@type": "oa:Annotation",
  "motivatedBy": ["oa:commenting", "oa:tagging"],
  "hasBody" : ["comment", "tag"],
  "hasTarget": "http://example.org/"
}
```

It's an outcome from the thread:  
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-annotation/2015Apr/0139.html

-- 
GitHub Notif of comment by azaroth42
See 
https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/31#issuecomment-96661471

Received on Monday, 27 April 2015 13:55:20 UTC