Re: [admin] Agenda: Teleconference 29 April 2015

And to flesh out the Annotation Sets section, I would propose:

* 15-20 minutes brainstorming use cases.  By brainstorming I mean there are
no wrong answers, we want to capture as broad a scope as possible for
potential uses.  Thus we should clarify UC descriptions but not question
them or try to pick them apart.

* 15 minutes considering the data model implications
  In particular, to prime the pumps, here are some existing uses:
  -- http://www.idpf.org/epub/oa/#h.48f1o3s9o9hf   --- Annotation
collections for EPUB
  -- https://code.google.com/p/annotation-ontology/wiki/AnnotationSet   ---
Annotation Sets in Annotation Ontology
  -- http://iiif.io/api/presentation/2.0/#other-content-resources  ---
Annotation Lists in IIIF
  -- LDP Containers

  -- Modeling and serializing order
  -- Descriptive metadata about the set

* 10 minutes considering the protocol implications
 -- To what extent do we need to enable the *construction* of Annotation
Sets/Lists in the protocol, versus just their retrieval?
 -- Create new lists, vs update existing lists only?


Rob


On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 6:59 AM, Frederick Hirsch <w3c@fjhirsch.com> wrote:

> Agenda - Web Annotation WG teleconference 29 April 2015
>
> Logistics:  zakim code: 2666    IRC:  #annotation
>
> 1. Agenda Review, Scribe Selection, Announcements
>
> 2 Minutes Approval, proposed RESOLUTION: minutes from 22 April 2015
> approved, see http://www.w3.org/2015/04/22-annotation-minutes.html
>
> possible defer
>
> 3 F2F, I Annotate, Hack Days Review
>
> Update on F2F, I Annotate and Hack Days
>
> 4 Annotation Sets
>
> Aspects across use cases/requirements, data model, protocol, client api etc
>
> 5 Other Business
>
> 6 Adjourn
>
> regards,  Rob & Frederick
>
> ---
> regards, Frederick
>
> Frederick Hirsch
> Co-Chair, W3C Web Annotation WG
>
> www.fjhirsch.com
> @fjhirsch
>
>
>


-- 
Rob Sanderson
Information Standards Advocate
Digital Library Systems and Services
Stanford, CA 94305