Yep, completely optional pattern to use if needed rather than multiple communities inventing their own way to say the same thing. Rob On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 10:16 AM, Jacob Jett <jjett2@illinois.edu> wrote: > Just to clarify this usage of schema to name audience roles would be an > optional feature in the model is that correct? > > _____________________________________________________ > Jacob Jett > Research Assistant > Center for Informatics Research in Science and Scholarship > The Graduate School of Library and Information Science > University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign > 501 E. Daniel Street, MC-493, Champaign, IL 61820-6211 USA > (217) 244-2164 > jjett2@illinois.edu > > On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 10:50 AM, Rob Sanderson via GitHub < > sysbot+gh@w3.org> wrote: > >> Motion to adopt the proposal in the next iteration of the WD :) >> >> >> >> -- >> GitHub Notif of comment by azaroth42 >> See >> https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/8#issuecomment-91269954 >> >> >> > -- Rob Sanderson Information Standards Advocate Digital Library Systems and Services Stanford, CA 94305
Received on Thursday, 9 April 2015 17:22:09 UTC