- From: Liam R E Quin <liam@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2014 23:32:55 -0400
- To: Robert Sanderson <azaroth42@gmail.com>
- Cc: Stian Soiland-Reyes <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk>, Annotation WG <public-annotation@w3.org>
On Sat, 18 Oct 2014 15:51:58 -0700 Robert Sanderson <azaroth42@gmail.com> wrote: > > Or, to make a stronger assertion, there's no value to having base64 encoded > content when it could be included as plain [utf-8] text. For any given string, yes, if you can put it in utf-8 and it doesn't contain control characters (C0 or C1) you're probably fine. Having both mechanisms available is different from encoding the same thing twice in differet ways & risking an integrity problem. If that's what you mean, we're agreed - thanks! -- Liam Quin - XML Activity Lead, W3C, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/ Pictures from old books: http://fromoldbooks.org/
Received on Sunday, 19 October 2014 03:33:03 UTC