- From: Randall Leeds <randall@bleeds.info>
- Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2014 17:01:37 -0700
- To: Nick Stenning <nick@whiteink.com>
- Cc: Web Annotation <public-annotation@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 15 October 2014 00:02:06 UTC
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 10:37 AM, Nick Stenning <nick@whiteink.com> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 14, 2014, at 18:58, Doug Schepers wrote: > > Hi, Rob– > > > > Small comment... > > > > On 10/14/14 12:08 PM, Robert Sanderson wrote: > > > > > > And my concerns with characterEncoding: > > > > > > 4. The encoding should be UTF-8 regardless. > > > > UTF-8 is not always sufficient. For some Asian scripts, you sometimes > > need UTF-16. > > UTF-8 can encode any unicode code point. UTF-16 may be more space > efficient for Japanese, Chinese, Thai, characters, but you don't "need" > UTF-8 in order to encode those scripts. > > But Doug probably knows things I don't. Do some user agents not support > asian script codepoint entry in UTF-8? > > In case anyone loves reading about these things: https://mathiasbynens.be/notes/javascript-encoding
Received on Wednesday, 15 October 2014 00:02:06 UTC