- From: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 14:02:37 -0500
- To: W3C Public Annotation List <public-annotation@w3.org>
Hi, folks– As you know, we've been working on integrating Annotator into the WebPlatform.org project, specifically to make it easier to annotate specifications. The Web Annotation WG is one of the first working groups to approve using this as a feedback mechanism (which seems appropriate). I'm convinced that in-band annotation will be a far superior feedback and discussion mechanism than W3C's traditional mailing list approach. But just how we execute on that, and what combination of software we use, is still an open question. So, this is an open invitation for any annotation projects or vendors to get involved in the experiment. This includes annotation authoring clients, reading clients, storage and search servers/repos, and any other annotation tools that may be out there (e.g. data visualizers, reasoning engines, or things we simply haven't thought of yet). As mentioned, our initial approach is to use the Annotator project, since it's open-source, has a large, active, and diverse contributor community, provides the core features that we need (an in-browser sidebar-based client for authoring and reading, and a searchable backend annotation repo), and because we've gotten integration support from Hypothesis. We are also open to working with any other projects or organizations. We feel there are enormous benefits to working with multiple annotation projects. It gives us the opportunity to try lots of different options, avoids lock-in to any single solution, road-tests our annotation specifications to get valuable experience, gives us multiple interoperable implementations for when we try to advance along the Recommendation track, and contributes to a thriving annotation ecosystem. There will be technical considerations that need to be addressed; right now, Annotator doesn't support the Web Annotation or Open Annotation data models, but that's going to be fixed within weeks. Once that happens, we should be able to easily share annotations between other servers and clients. I would like to use that time to prep other services to make sure that all the pieces will work together. So, if you'd like to work with us to use your annotation project as part of this spec annotation experiment, please join the dedicated Spec Annotation Community Group [1], where we will be coordinating. I've started jotting down some initial requirements and phases in the CG wiki [2], and I welcome suggestions for improving them. As Frederick noted, we plan to work closely between the Spec Annotation CG and other relevant groups, including the Web Annotation WG, the Social Web WG, the WebApps WG, the HTML WG, and any other groups that have deliverables that will bear on implementations (e.g. Robust Anchoring, Selection API, HTML editing APIs, ActivityStreams or other social APIs, and so on). We'll also be coordinating with working groups that want to use the annotation tool, including this WG, the Audio WG, and others. Happy Thanksgiving, for those of you celebrating that, and happy dinner plans for everyone else! [1] http://www.w3.org/community/spec-annotation/ [2] https://www.w3.org/community/spec-annotation/wiki/ Regards- -Doug
Received on Wednesday, 26 November 2014 19:02:46 UTC