Re: Call for Consensus: publish FPWD of Web Annotation Model with short name annotation-model; respond by 2 December 2014.

Other than my already voiced concerns about how we describe "annotating" in
the abstract and introduction, the FPWD looks to be a robust document. +1

Good work all. :)

_____________________________________________________
Jacob Jett
Research Assistant
Center for Informatics Research in Science and Scholarship
The Graduate School of Library and Information Science
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
501 E. Daniel Street, MC-493, Champaign, IL 61820-6211 USA
(217) 244-2164
jjett2@illinois.edu

On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 8:35 AM, Frederick Hirsch <w3c@fjhirsch.com> wrote:

> This is a Call for Consensus (CfC)  to publish a First Public Working
> Draft (FPWD) of the ‘Web Annotation Data Model’ produced by the Annotation
> Working Group, and adopting the short name of “annotation-model” for this
> specification [1]
>
> The publication draft is here:
> http://w3c.github.io/web-annotation/model_fpwd/static.html
>
> Please review and note any concerns on the public list ( public-annotation
> @ w3.org ). This CfC ends in two weeks, Tuesday  2 December 2014.
>
> Please note that a FPWD is just that, a first public draft, so it need not
> be perfect and subsequent change is possible; publishing this draft should
> give it further review and attention.
>
> Please respond to this CfC (even a +1 is useful). Silence will be
> considered agreement. The anticipated publication date is 14 December.
>
> Thanks
>
> regards, Frederick and Rob
>
> Frederick Hirsch, Nokia
> Rob Sanderson, Stanford
> Co-Chairs W3C Web Annotation WG
>
> [1] please note those on the teleconference 12 November agreed to this
> short name: http://www.w3.org/2014/11/12-annotation-minutes.html#item04
>
>
>
>