- From: Frederick Hirsch <w3c@fjhirsch.com>
- Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 15:01:41 -0500
- To: Annotation WG <public-annotation@w3.org>
- Cc: Frederick Hirsch <w3c@fjhirsch.com>, Stian Soiland-Reyes <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk>, Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
Everyone (not Doug in particular) We agreed the short name on the call with annotation-model, http://www.w3.org/2014/11/12-annotation-minutes.html#item04 The next step is to prepare an editors draft and then have a CfC for publishing that FPWD with that short name. I’ve been waiting for an editors draft to send out the CfC and hope soon we have it. Remember it is just a draft, we can fix the abstract or other aspects as we move forward, so it does not have to be perfect (let’s not lose sight of the tremendous amount of excellent work that is in it already) I think we should be making concrete progress on the deliverables rather than cycling on the short name, so request that we stay with what we agreed on the call. thanks regards, Frederick Frederick Hirsch, Nokia Co-Chair W3C Web Annotation WG @fjhirsch On Nov 14, 2014, at 2:49 PM, Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org> wrote: > Hi, Stian– > > On 11/14/14 7:08 AM, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote: >> Here are my suggestions for temporary short names (which admittedly >> are not that short): >> >> We already have agreed: >> web-annotation: Annotation Abstract Data Model > > I don't think we did agree on that. From the thread on this [1], I heard the most agreement on > > * annotation-model: Annotation Abstract Data Model > > The others Rob suggested work for me and Ivan (at least): > > * annotation-protocol > * annotation-interface > * web-anchoring > > Frederick suggested we start with "annotation-model" and worry about the others later. > > >> so.. >> web-annotation-vocab: Vocabulary for the Annotation Abstract Data Model >> web-annotation-serialization: Serializations of the Annotation >> Abstract Data Model >> (or web-annotation-json if we only do JSON here) >> web-annotation-api: HTTP API for Annotations >> web-annotation-client: Client-Side API for Annotations >> web-annotation-link: Robust Link Anchoring >> >> Do we really need "web-" btw? w3c is all about the web.. > > Rob made the same argument, and I think folks generally agreed. > > > [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-annotation/2014Nov/0019.html > > Regards- > -Doug >
Received on Friday, 14 November 2014 20:02:14 UTC