azaroth42[1] just left a note on ""[2].


Well ... section 4 and section 5 could be considered "modules" I guess, but in terms of other W3C spec precedents, it's certainly misleading. On the other hand, the message (section 3 is core, the rest is gravy) is something to consider with respect to the levels of conformance discussion from TPAC2014 f2f.

View this annotation: https://notes.webplatform.org/a/CkVHxTVmQauc41HzofWajg

[1] https://notes.webplatform.org/u/azaroth42
[2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/WD-annotation-model-20141211/

Received on Friday, 12 December 2014 00:50:21 UTC