Re: Spatial KR, Synthetic Users, and “software as space” in K3D

Just a thought.  Can we arrange one or more Zoom meetings to discuss an
agenda on how to proceed from here. This will avoid lengthy email
discussions and get things done much faster.

Milton Ponson
Rainbow Warriors Core Foundation
CIAMSD Institute-ICT4D Program
+2977459312
PO Box 1154, Oranjestad
Aruba, Dutch Caribbean

On Sun, Nov 16, 2025, 14:10 Milton Ponson <rwiciamsd@gmail.com> wrote:

> Daniel and all,
>
> We are wasting out time on nuts and bolts level quarreling. Both the
> spatial baseline ontology and K3D are instantiations of a more fundamental
> framework.
>
> Maybe Daniel should run the spatial baseline ontology and check if it is a
> special case of my framework model which in essence has created the new
> mathematical field of semantic compression.
>
> But I must admit that I left out two key number theory elements in my
> description of the mandala graph framework.  Since everything that is
> prompted to an ai agent gets recorded and I cherish intellectual property
> linked to my work,  in essence it won't change the results produced by
> Perplexity. What they do establish is a link to the Langlands program.
>
> What's happening in AI oriented computer science is akin to the biblical
> story of the tower of Babel where the computer scientists where trying to
> build the tower of AGI and then the "God of generative AI based 9n LLMs "',
> Sam Altman,  scattered the scientists all over the place.
>
> There is no common language anymore.
>
> So we MUST GO BACK TO MATHEMATICS,  TO FIND UNIVERSALITY.
>
> Apparently Demis Hassabis at Deepmind figured this out, but everybody is
> dismissing him at their own peril.
>
> I am moving steadfast in reconstruction of the tower of Babel using
> mathematics as the language for construction and design.
>
> And with a little help of my AI agents.
>
> On Sun, Nov 16, 2025, 13:27 Daniel Ramos <capitain_jack@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> Following the recent exchanges about spatial KR, domains of discourse,
>> and the role of AI in standards, I’ve written up two short documents that
>> may clarify the paradigm I’ve been trying to describe with K3D:
>>
>> Spatial KR Visual Encoding
>>
>> https://github.com/danielcamposramos/Knowledge3D/tree/main/docs/SPATIAL_KR_VISUAL_ENCODING.md
>>
>> How domains of discourse, concepts, relations, modality, time and
>> adequacy are encoded as stars, rays, Gardens and Museums.
>> How Galaxy, Knowledge Garden and Museum share one coordinate system and
>> one set of visual semantics.
>> Software as Space & Web 4.0 – K3D Perspective
>>
>> https://github.com/danielcamposramos/Knowledge3D/tree/main/docs/SOFTWARE_AS_SPACE_WEB4.md
>>
>> How “software as space” and a Web 4.0 style of interaction emerge when
>> Houses/Rooms/Doors/Galaxies/Gardens/Museums become the primary interface.
>> How AutoCAD‑class tools, games, and legacy web applications can live as
>> Rooms and Doors, reusing existing web protocols.
>> How we model Synthetic Users (AI inhabitants) and Human Users with
>> multiple avatars (PC/phone/AR/VR/BCI, blind/deaf/low‑mobility, etc.) as
>> first‑class users of the same spatial OS.
>> The intent is to separate:
>>
>> the KR layer (domains of discourse, vocabularies, spatial categories);
>> from the implementation layer (PTX/CUDA, WebXR, devices),
>> while making it clear how both humans and Synthetic Users (AI agents)
>> cohabit the same spatial memory and act through the same 288‑byte action
>> contract.
>> For anyone interested in how this relates to adequacy, domains of
>> discourse, and the limits of scaling that Milton and Dave have raised, I’d
>> be happy to iterate on these docs with you or map specific KR ontologies
>> (SUMO/DOLCE/BFO, StratML, etc.) into the House/Galaxy/Garden/Museum
>> structures.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Daniel
>>
> Milton Ponson
> Rainbow Warriors Core Foundation
> CIAMSD Institute-ICT4D Program
> +2977459312
> PO Box 1154, Oranjestad
> Aruba, Dutch Caribbean
>