- From: CHARLES WAWERU <cmukabi@aol.com>
- Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2025 21:42:08 +0300
- To: paoladimaio10@googlemail.com
- Cc: W3C AIKR CG <public-aikr@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <2E7129A3-3D39-4535-9CEF-05FE6FA15348@aol.com>
Using the analogy of paywall where access is only granted after payment is made . Now let’s say the information is visible (like through the glass- ) but not accessible to verify because of the glass wall. In this case , AI can see what they see but can’t prove it because can’t access it(ie touch/contact/verify ). So what you see or AI ‘sees’ is because of what is ‘allowed’ to see. What happens in this case ? How can KR help? Charles . Sent from my iPhone http://share.payoneer.com/nav/QVCAMdwwLEzTHFv0LgtPy4MhJQ3AGwSli1rtz8A95x9tBafV8puBAroUEusyMVSg32hIAvEKvhibLKoacJc_Og2 > On 29 Jun 2025, at 08:23, Paola Di Maio <paola.dimaio@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Three neurodivergent ontologists walk into a restaurant. > > The host asks, “Table for three?” > One says, “Define ‘three’ in mereological terms.” > Another says, “I prefer a booth—it’s less overstimulating.” > The third is already reorganizing the menu into a taxonomic hierarchy. > > The waiter asks, “Can I get you something to drink?” > One says, “Is the concept of ‘drink’ a rigid designator or a cluster concept?” > Another says, “I’ll have water, but only if it’s categorically distinct from all non-water entities.” > The third says, “Do you have a sensory-friendly beverage ontology?” > > They sit down and immediately start debating whether the restaurant itself is an object or a process. > > After an hour, they haven’t ordered anything, but they’ve developed a new upper ontology to classify every dish. > >
Received on Sunday, 29 June 2025 18:42:30 UTC