- From: Peter Rivett <pete.rivett@federatedknowledge.com>
- Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2024 18:25:31 +0000
- To: Chris Harding <chris@lacibus.net>, "paoladimaio10@googlemail.com" <paoladimaio10@googlemail.com>
- CC: W3C AIKR CG <public-aikr@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <BY5PR14MB392169E0F95C7AD5CFE8443381362@BY5PR14MB3921.namprd14.prod.outlook.com>
It's not clear to me in all this what format(s) existing glossaries/vocabularies in step 3 (do we have a list?) are expected to be in, and what the required generated output format should be. And, for step 4, what degree of difference should lead to a new vocabulary entry. And how the new entry should reference the existing one (e.g. as some sort of "similar" or specialized term). And, in the resultant ecosystem, how the whole family of vocabularies should be represented; both the existing ones that can be reused and the new differentiated terms. It would also seem desirable to be able to indicate the specific terms in the existing vocabularies that have been deemed reusable. To answer my own question somewhat, there is the OMG Multiple Vocabulary Facility https://www.omg.org/spec/MVF that provides for different vocabularies (terms and definitions related to Communities and with mutual import relationships) with the terms mapped to their meaning as a concept. However a lot depends on how we expect the set of vocabularies to be used and by whom (type/role of person or machine)? Pete Pete Rivett (pete.rivett@federatedknowledge.com) Federated Knowledge, LLC (LEI 98450013F6D4AFE18E67) tel: +1-701-566-9534 Schedule a meeting at https://calendly.com/rivettp ________________________________ From: Chris Harding <chris@lacibus.net> Sent: Tuesday, December 3, 2024 9:37 AM To: paoladimaio10@googlemail.com <paoladimaio10@googlemail.com> Cc: W3C AIKR CG <public-aikr@w3.org> Subject: Re: what AI tool can we use to generate the AI KR CG vocabulary Hi Paola I am working on a commercial tool in this area. I can do 1 and 2: they are no problem with modern NLP technology but, as with anything produced by AI, need final human review. 3, 4 and 5 should be fairly straightforward also, but would need some work on the mechanism for importing existing glossaries/vocabularies. On 03/12/2024 03:05, Paola Di Maio wrote: > Knowledgeable CG members > > Since the future is here, suggestions as to how to generate > a vocabulary, would be great (preferably open, free, online tool or > python script?) > Process > 1.select source of K (upload or point to source doc) > 2. extract key terms and definitions > 3. compare key terms with existing glossaries/vocabularies already > published (input URLs) > 4. if not included in existing resources in 3 OR > if definition is different from the same term in existing > resource in 3 > THEN > 5. include term in a list (to be discussed, evaluated, refined) > > I definitely buy drinks is someone can do -- Regards, Chris ++++ Chris Harding Chief Executive, Lacibus Ltd
Received on Tuesday, 3 December 2024 18:25:40 UTC