Given the TPAC breakout and subsequent conversations, looks like we have
multiple "focus groups"[1] to proceed on in the CG.
* Home assistant
* AI/KR
Another I suggest for consideration is "WoT Dogfooding" for the W3c. An
example that comes to mind could be a WoT device to manage your position on
the Zakim Queue. I mocked up an example with powerpoint:
[image: image.png]
I often find myself slinging windows around between IRC, github, teams/zoom
etc. Having a separate device on my desk with the queue manager would be
useful.
This could be a WoT device and a WoT consumer could be bolted on to the
side of Zakim.
[1] The term "focus group" was chosen as opposed to Task Force to avoid
being confused for WG activity.
On Fri, Oct 13, 2023 at 7:50 AM Luca Barbato <luca.barbato@luminem.it>
wrote:
> On 13/10/23 11:36, Paola Di Maio wrote:
> > Apologies, Luca. I requested you to introduce yourself because I assumed
> > you had an internal meeting internal AI KR CC just ignore us :-) we now
> > have better understanding of the context and take this opportunity to
> say hi
> > Look forward to future opportunities to exchange
> >
>
> No problem:)
>
> I since one of my interests is making sure the WoT Thing Description can
> carry information about the real-world impact of connected Things[1],
> I'm sure your input and experience will be precious.
>
> lu
>
> [1]:
>
> https://github.com/w3c/wot-usecases/blob/main/USE-CASES/hazard-annotations.md
>
>
--
---
*Josh Co*hen
